One thing I have learned is love can thrive with emotional intimacy even when the physical side is denied through circumstance. lust is a thing of novelty and usually not worth the tissues
I have never been in that situation but if I had to choice between love and affection, then I would choose affection and find love (sex) elsewhere as do most of the men from the European countries.
However, I have never had to make that choice.
Dave asked me if I wanted to find sex elsewhere, I didn't.... Couldn't countenance it. However in my first marriage when it was obvious my husband didn't want it I felt ok about finding playmates keeping it uncomplicated. First sign of emotional involvement I would end it.
rowan...don't buy it.
You tell him what he wants to hear and he tells you what you want to hear.
Reality is often quite the reverse of what was said.
There was no reply from you when i answered your question as to would I sacrifice my life for Mrs sqad. I presume if I had answered YES,then you would have said that,that was love.
No Sqad, I would have said you were lying.
I think Dave might have risked his life for me, but knowing he was dying a reciprocal arrangement would have been pointless. He made the offer due to our age difference, before we were married . If I had been able to accept I would have cancelled the wedding knowing exactly what I was giving up. Who knows what may come one lives in hope of one more adventure.
i’ve listened to blokes all my life, and am now, coming to its end, convinced that the majority of men are at best self-centred when it comes to relationships, and at worst utter pigs.
If your Dave was an exception, then cherish his sweet memory. He is not just one in a million. He is one in MANY millions.