Road rules0 min ago
Sunak -V- Starmer Tv Debate
ITV tonight
Your thoughts?
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.labour and the tories simply are not capable of addressing the very serious problems this country has. they are political machines that exist to win elections and nothing else. a proportional system would be slow and frustrating and necessitate compromise. i am also convinced it would be an improvement on what we currently have, which is a lurch between two ineffectual parties about every 10-15 years. even large majorities have not guaranteed stability because this country is at root a badly governed place. the two parties have no real interest in changing that because to do so would challenge their power.
I also think Starmer was lying. Who wouldn't want the very best, the quickest possible medical help for a loved one? Sadly this is no longer the NHS - as I have recent experience to act as testimony.
There is the point that if Starmer ( who is fairly wealthy) did not pay for private treatment, his loved one would be extending the queue for others - when he could have shortened it.
Yes, that was definitely an own goal Jourdain. Nobody, with even a flicker of a modicum of common sense, would believe he wouldn't pay for private treatment.
He's not in the same wealth bracket as Sunak, but I've heard he's worth a few million, so him saying he would not go private is just simply not believable...or in other words a lie. I know all politicians are liars, but can we trust somebody who blatantly lies on national TV to that extent? I think not.
Frankly, they all as bad as each other, which is why I have made the conscious decision not to bother voting.
//There is the point that if Starmer ( who is fairly wealthy) did not pay for private treatment, his loved one would be extending the queue for others - when he could have shortened it.//
I'm not sure that's true - doctors providing private treatments often also work in the NHS, so in some cases going private is simply jumping the queue not shortening it. (I may be wrong)
"NJ 14.55 "The NHS is a complete and utter shambles"And you are blaming Labour."
I don't normally respond to your ramblings, gully, but if you read what my post actually says rather than what you think it says., you will see I blamed nobody for the state of the NHS.
This is one of the main reasons why I generally ignore your posts.
//I'm not sure that's true - doctors providing private treatments often also work in the NHS, so in some cases going private is simply jumping the queue not shortening it. (I may be wrong)//
I'm not sure, davebro. You may be right up to a point, but doctors do private work in their spare time, working part time for NHS and part time privately. The private work pays better. If the private work fell they might decide to 'have a day off' rather than ask to increase their NHS hours. Also, private hsopitals provide beds and equipment; if the patient chooses to use NHS there may be no bed in the NHS hospital