The K M Links Game - November 2024 Week...
Quizzes & Puzzles9 mins ago
Some might see this as undignified, even attention seeking.
I'm sure 'some' would be wrong though and there are plenty of opinioneers to put them straight on the matter.
https:/
No best answer has yet been selected by douglas9401. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Neville and Doreen divorced and started quarelling about the grave
Romans are OK with digging someone up and singing - lah-dee-dah, parading it around ( or an image) Taking it down to the sea and giving it a wash ( Francis Xavier, Goa). More la-dee-dah and reburying - - -
But Proddies arent - buried once, resurrect once ( er day of judgement - phew!) - doctrine from the 16th century
remember they dug up St Cuthbert ( 750) or so and took him from Lindisfarne to Chester le street
"he would not be at peace in this country".
“After 31 years, we have decided as a family that we would like to bring Stephen home to be closer to us.”
Why was his body exhumed? and
If the poor beggar wouldn't rest easy here could interested parties not move nearer to him?
I've no strong feelings either way but it does all seem just a tad mixed up.
As long as all costs are paid by the Lawrence family, and the Brtitish taxpayer is not expected to fund any of it, I don't think anyone else has the right to comment on the family's decision to bring their son's body back to UK.
The Lawrence family must do what they feel is right for them.
As for "attention-seeking" - it is inevitable that any action taken in relation to such a high profile case, even after all these years, would draw media attention. I think that it is unlikely that it is a deliberate attempt to draw attention.