Donate SIGN UP

Chancellor Needs Help

Avatar Image
gramps85 | 15:02 Tue 15th Oct 2024 | News
14 Answers

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/tax/income/rachel-reeves-claimed-1225-expenses-help-tax-returns/

It seems that the Chancellor needed to employ an accountant to help her complete her tax return. Can we trust somebody who needs this help, to manage the countries finances?

Gravatar

Answers

1 to 14 of 14rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by gramps85. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

It just doesn't add up :)

Question Author

I should have added that she claimed £1225.00 expenses for doing so.

Don't trust any of them as far as I could throw them.  

You should see the SNP thieves up here in Scotland Maggie.

Thousands of people rely on others to handle their tax returns; that’s precisely why we have accountants. The fact that she employs an accountant doesn’t imply she’s incapable of doing it herself. Rather, it signifies she has more pressing matters to attend to.

I'm not sure she should be charging us for it.

If it’s a legitimate business expense, then why not? Regrettably, the article is behind a paywall, so I’m unable to read it.

She's an employee - she's not in business. 

well, I am not surprised - how does one write off a £4000 heating claim for your second home......?

 how does one write off a £4000 heating claim for your second home.....

erm i dont think we were writing it off

we were claiming it as an expense, werent we? (  the two are completely different - the write off is a loss you cant claim anywhere as an expense ) - and an expense is something that er you can - [OK forget  that last bit]

She's an employee - she's not in business. 

oh come on come on -as an employee you dont have expenses? well you do but they are very limited - the MP account seems to be difft with gtr expenses allowed

and the employment position of an MP is NOT as an employee or else someone wd be able to fire them. They cant. and  They wd be able to claim in employment tribunals. They cant .jesus

 can mods bear in mind, the crushing one liner may not be the accurate one liner

Members of Parliament (MPs) are not employed in any legal sense of the word. MPs are elected to their position by the electorate after putting themselves up as ...

we all really knew that - didnt we and were just quipping and one-lining

Doesn't say much about her financial acumen and doesn't bode well for the rest of us. And why should we pay for her expenses relating to her tax returns?

You should see the SNP thieves up here in Scotland Maggie.

yeah foo !

Ay did not steal that mobile home: may husband did

And why should we pay for her expenses relating to her tax returns?

completely garbled rubbish - chrissakes

1 to 14 of 14rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Chancellor Needs Help

Answer Question >>

Related Questions