What happened to the news about this?

[yassa]

I am not asking who done it....
Until recently i had never heard of Building no7 but now i know it fell to the ground the same day as the Twin towers and was only a couple of blocks away... Has anyone else not heard of this 'building no7', and why has it not been covered by UK news?

[Lonnie]

I'd never heard of it, but I found this site, and one explanation on it says it may not have been considered newsworthy, because no-one died, it being the day after 9-11.

http://911research.wtc7.net/materials/wtc/b7.h tml

[yassa]

I thought it was the same day.

[shero101]

I came across this recently. The footage I have seen clearly shows it collapsing like a controlled demolition and certainly adds fuel to the conspiracy surrounding the terrible events of 9/11.

[yassa]

Don't say the 'C' word on here, they will all think you have an IQ of 4, but if you believe everything you are told by officials then you are very smart according to most on here. Personally anyone who thinks a couple of sand dancers brought down the twin towers have got to be living in a cave.

[spudqueen]

The World Trade Centre was a big site, the towers which were hit by the planes were World Trade Centre one and two, it stands to reason that as there was a building 7 there were also buildings 3,4,5 and 6.

Don't believe all that rot about a conspiracy. By the time building 7 came down it was later on in the day, it had been severely damaged by all that had happened earlier that day and there were no people left in it. If a controlled explosion was what was needed to bring it down in a controlled way then that was the way to do it. So what! It doesn't mean that the other buildings were brought down that way!

And why on earth should building no 7 be on our news? It was an empty building collapsing! There were 4 planes which had been hijacked - one crashed in a field, one flew into the pentagon and the other two into the twin towers, thousands of people were killed or injured, why would people be interested in building 7???

[yassa]

OK Spud, i get your point but to completely spin it round, why didn't Bush use every bit of evidence, It has been proved he used a hell of a load of bullsh1t to start his war against terror, so why not use this, why not maxamise the damage caused in his quest for war? Why make stuff up and not use this,,? I think we all really know why and i can appreciate that a lot of people don't want to face the truth because it turns their world upside down, but the evidence is there. You can see the second plane has no windows. with your own eyes you can see both towers were brought down controlled, you can see the fuel burn up on the outside of the building, it didn't melt the structure from the inside like has been told. You can see explosions in the buildings just before they went down. New york fire fighters have said on film it was a controlled explosion,,, what more do you want, has Bush got to admit it himself, is that the only way you could believe?

[the 5niper]

I got home at just after 11 o clock that night you can imagine the 8 or 9 hours previous were more than mad at Bn HQ, anyhoo I turned on Sky news just as that particular building was going down.

[Catra 999]

I saw it collapse when we was all watching the towers fall Live on TV. How did you all miss it, it was shown loads.
Obviously it was overshadowed by the towers, and it was reported to have been empty so no lives were lost from it falling. I agree that it did look like a controlled collapse though. Very strange.