Question Author
I see you had early tuition, Quizmonkey. It must have been great to have someone show you the ropes in person. Plus, being a linguist obviously helps. Obviously, my maths-and-physics background means that in my professional life I don't get chance to extend my vocab, that's part of why I've loved the new past time of cryptics. It's a standing joke that most scientists can't string a coherent sentence together, but I strive to be multi-faceted. I do not own a copy of Chambers, and I have never asked anyone to reveal all the complexities of a cryptic masterpiece on the day of publication, although my requests for tips have sometimes led to more detail than I'd anticipated. Have been through the recycle bin and dug out old EV, and managed to complete 764 on my own (no, I didn't look at the answers!).As I've said before, I know nobody in my day to day life that does EV, so thank you to everyone who keeps encouraging people like myself and Christiana - although I suspect that C is further along the curve than I am. Hope mine's exponential :)