Should I Send This Card Or Not?
ChatterBank7 mins ago
I seem to remember back at school when learning about molecules that they are in fact a theory and cannot be proved as they cannot be seen. Whoevers theory it was defined their workings by comparing them to snookerballs. Because everyone knows about molecules I think people will think its common sense that they exist without actually looking into it. People also get confused between atoms and molecules which are 2 seperate entities. Could someone please tell me if I am talking Boll*cks?
No best answer has yet been selected by Danlad. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Clanad -
You are right that an atom is not the smallest thing which forms part of "an element". However, I think 101325 was really correct -- it is the smallest thing which can be assigned exclusively to a particular element -- all the smaller bits and pieces occur in other elements just as much. If you chop an atom up any smaller it becomes something else.
Danlad -
I think molecular theory is pretty much proved by now, long before anyone seeing a molecule or atom. Clanad is right that electron tunnelling microscopes can now resolve molecules and even larger atoms -- and x-ray diffraction also shows their shapes and sizes indirectly.
There are lots of solidly accepted scientific theories about things which you can't see, or which you can see but can't touch. No-one, for example, doubts that the sun is a ball of hot stuff 90-odd million miles from us.