ChatterBank6 mins ago
Banach�Tarski paradox
2 Answers
okay, i know NOTHING about geomotry, but this really interests me...
I cant understand how physically you could get two balls (yeah yeah i said balls - i mean a sphere for those immature people!) out of one...i mean...how?
id love to know, especially since these guys apparently sussed it! im jelous to be honest, i want to know!
also, i read somewhere about how they figure they can get infinite balls out of one....what!?
could someone explain it to me in the simplist possible terms, if that is possible...as its such a complex topic i appreciate! i think its so unfair interesting things like this go unmissed by people like me who dont understand them because of their complexity. why cant someone publish a book explaining the most interesting complex things but in the simplist way?
anyway, id appeciate it if someone could help!
I cant understand how physically you could get two balls (yeah yeah i said balls - i mean a sphere for those immature people!) out of one...i mean...how?
id love to know, especially since these guys apparently sussed it! im jelous to be honest, i want to know!
also, i read somewhere about how they figure they can get infinite balls out of one....what!?
could someone explain it to me in the simplist possible terms, if that is possible...as its such a complex topic i appreciate! i think its so unfair interesting things like this go unmissed by people like me who dont understand them because of their complexity. why cant someone publish a book explaining the most interesting complex things but in the simplist way?
anyway, id appeciate it if someone could help!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by dannyday5821. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I think this related to the fractal star of David.
In this you take an equilateral triangle and divide each side into 3 and draw an equilateral triangle on the middle third of each side you get a star of David.
If each side of the first triangle was of length x the circumference of the triangle was 3x
Now it's 3(x-1/3x+2/3x) = 4x
Now do the same again and again like this:
http://library.thinkquest.org/26242/full/types /images/22.gif
Do this an infinite number of times and you have a figure with an infinite circumference the will still fit within a circle and hence has a finite area.
In the same way the pieces that the sphere must be subdivided into parts that are infinitely complex and hence only possible in a mathematician's mind
In this you take an equilateral triangle and divide each side into 3 and draw an equilateral triangle on the middle third of each side you get a star of David.
If each side of the first triangle was of length x the circumference of the triangle was 3x
Now it's 3(x-1/3x+2/3x) = 4x
Now do the same again and again like this:
http://library.thinkquest.org/26242/full/types /images/22.gif
Do this an infinite number of times and you have a figure with an infinite circumference the will still fit within a circle and hence has a finite area.
In the same way the pieces that the sphere must be subdivided into parts that are infinitely complex and hence only possible in a mathematician's mind
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.