ChatterBank0 min ago
Question removed yet again
10 Answers
What is going off on this site? I posted a question titled "Recession what recession" on Wed 8th Oct. at 12.23. For some reason it has been removed.
icemaiden posted a similar question titled "I can't believe this" in Chatterbox on Wed 8th Oct. at 13.34, over 1 hour after my question, and it still remains.
Am I treading on too many toes?
China Doll
The answer I have posted to you I will repeat,
Of course the link/slant (your words, I would rather call them associations) I made are not the same as yours China Doll.
The advantage I have of using my association of words, is because I happened to post the link first not you, hence my referal to "our troops".
You say, "It is entirely to do with a council and a land lord and several misconceptions".
What you failed to say first, "in my opinion"
I put my slant on it, the Daily Mail did not comment, and you put your slant on it.
I put my slant on it because i had every right to do so, since it was my question. You put your slant on it because they were your opinions, fair enough.
But please don't be so arrogant as to state that both myself and the Daily Mail are talking tosh, just because we have made different interpretations to this news item than you have.
I refer you once again to the last paragraph of my answer to Quinlad.
icemaiden posted a similar question titled "I can't believe this" in Chatterbox on Wed 8th Oct. at 13.34, over 1 hour after my question, and it still remains.
Am I treading on too many toes?
China Doll
The answer I have posted to you I will repeat,
Of course the link/slant (your words, I would rather call them associations) I made are not the same as yours China Doll.
The advantage I have of using my association of words, is because I happened to post the link first not you, hence my referal to "our troops".
You say, "It is entirely to do with a council and a land lord and several misconceptions".
What you failed to say first, "in my opinion"
I put my slant on it, the Daily Mail did not comment, and you put your slant on it.
I put my slant on it because i had every right to do so, since it was my question. You put your slant on it because they were your opinions, fair enough.
But please don't be so arrogant as to state that both myself and the Daily Mail are talking tosh, just because we have made different interpretations to this news item than you have.
I refer you once again to the last paragraph of my answer to Quinlad.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.