Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Should Jonathon Ross & Russell Brand be sacked?
37 Answers
Considering that they are employed by the BBC and thus effectively we are their bosses, should they be sacked for their disgraceful and shameful behaviour toward Andrew Sachs. Until now I have found JR amusing at times although he can be too much and would prefer his not taking over shows in which he was a guest, whereas RB is to my way of thinking a complete waste of a life without any redeeming qualities whatsoever. I think they should be sacked immediately. Comments please.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by osprey. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.They shouldn't have done it.
They got carried away; being the sort of 'comedians' they are.
It was beyond the limits of 'funny' and 'naughty' - but hey, with all the violence death killings going on in the world, it hardly registers on a scale of disasters does it?
Mountain out of a molehill springs to mind. Slap on wrist, but of public slagging & flogging, then forget about it please.
They got carried away; being the sort of 'comedians' they are.
It was beyond the limits of 'funny' and 'naughty' - but hey, with all the violence death killings going on in the world, it hardly registers on a scale of disasters does it?
Mountain out of a molehill springs to mind. Slap on wrist, but of public slagging & flogging, then forget about it please.
Over reaction or what. Jeremy Beadle used to make a living out of doing something similar to members of the public, no one complained because it is entertainment. That's what this is, entertainment, if you don't find it entertaining turn it off or switch over!
Before anyone has a go at Ross or Brand can you honestly say you have never teased anyone? That's not to say that I expect everyone has called some one to tell them that they slept with their grand daughter.
Before anyone has a go at Ross or Brand can you honestly say you have never teased anyone? That's not to say that I expect everyone has called some one to tell them that they slept with their grand daughter.
High Loftie my love, I rarely if ever visit this section...BUT.I have no time for JR and had never heard of this Brand chap.They made "off-line" comments to retired actor about his grand-daughter. Recorded off-line the night before, both probably under the influence of alcohol or worse and said things that were irresponsible, lewd and totaly puerile and inappropriate. Who can say that they have never made stupid remars like that in the past, and later regretted them? Certainly not me. They also asked the opinion of a senior BBC vetting person who gave them the green light.
Stupid ..yes...vulgar..yes.....but hardly a sacking situation.
Stupid ..yes...vulgar..yes.....but hardly a sacking situation.
Yes I agree we've probably all said things we're sorry for, but the point is these two charmless twits did it on radio - a service which we pay for with a licence fee, and are fined heavily if we don't have that said licence.
Frankly I object to paying money for people to be able to behave like this. I object to paying so much damn money that the BBC can apparently pay the egregious Ross �6m a year! And I simply object to Brand altogether, he's about as funny as nuclear fallout!
Why not sack them, they're neither of them useful or necessary. Ross, unless he spends money like water, must have quite enough to live on and Brand might spend some time finding some new material - but no, don't put all the blame on the producer of the show, that's much too easy. He loses his job and the offenders get off without a hitch. BBC seen to do their job with only a 'menial' thrown onto the scrap heap.
Oh and I understand Ross has send Mr. Sachs some flowers to say sorry! Ah, how thoughtful! Pity Mr Sachs is too much of a gentleman to stuff them down his throat really!
Frankly I object to paying money for people to be able to behave like this. I object to paying so much damn money that the BBC can apparently pay the egregious Ross �6m a year! And I simply object to Brand altogether, he's about as funny as nuclear fallout!
Why not sack them, they're neither of them useful or necessary. Ross, unless he spends money like water, must have quite enough to live on and Brand might spend some time finding some new material - but no, don't put all the blame on the producer of the show, that's much too easy. He loses his job and the offenders get off without a hitch. BBC seen to do their job with only a 'menial' thrown onto the scrap heap.
Oh and I understand Ross has send Mr. Sachs some flowers to say sorry! Ah, how thoughtful! Pity Mr Sachs is too much of a gentleman to stuff them down his throat really!
I just think this has got way out of control now. I'm sure Sachs didn't think his daughter was no angel by looking at her and being in a group called **something** *****. I meant, come on!
Ok, it was a tasteless joke but no one would have complained at the amount people have if the media/papers got involved. I'm sure there are other important things to spread across the papers then Ross and Brand.
I can't stand Brand but I actually like Ross.
Ok, it was a tasteless joke but no one would have complained at the amount people have if the media/papers got involved. I'm sure there are other important things to spread across the papers then Ross and Brand.
I can't stand Brand but I actually like Ross.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.