Strands#265 Did You Hear That?
Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
Where are the UKIP?
26 Answers
The Daily Mail and its readership are to the right of the Tories but stop short of supporting the BNP. Well, what about the UKIP? The are not overtly neo-fascist or racist, but they are to the right of the Tories. They are anti-EU and want to freeze immigration. We don't seem to hear much about them though. How come?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by JockSporran. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Quinlad
"If you are referring to my post on the gangs of black youths who ganged raped two school girls, then what are you saying that I should not have called them savages or creatures?"
Nice try. But you know what you said.
I know what I said, the point is did you read it correct?
Perhaps you would care to read it through again and point out to me the items that trouble you, instead of just posting a copy of what I posted, followed by a nondescript comment?
"If you are referring to my post on the gangs of black youths who ganged raped two school girls, then what are you saying that I should not have called them savages or creatures?"
Nice try. But you know what you said.
I know what I said, the point is did you read it correct?
Perhaps you would care to read it through again and point out to me the items that trouble you, instead of just posting a copy of what I posted, followed by a nondescript comment?
*sigh*
You wrote a question about a gang of rapists, AOG. Within that thread, you deviated onto the subject of non-white immigrants. You then referred to them, rather than the rapists, as savages. Your choice of tense suggests as much.
A quick summary:
You: When are these gangs going to be cleared from our streets? Is it any wonder people are leaving this once pleasant land?
VHG: Without beating about the bush, many of these crimes are committed by immigrants (or children of immigrants). [Recalling a visit to his local hospital] We were there about 3 hours, and I have to say I was disgusted by the number of immigrants I saw.
You: Yes one has only to look at pictures of school classes on TV news, (mainly when politicians are visiting) to notice that white children are in the minority. I am only pleased that I do not have to take my children to school, and see that they are perhaps the only white children in the class. And before we are accused of being racist, we are not, we are just highlighting white people's concerns.
Me: Some find it odd that others have almost arbitrarily decided to attach colossal importance to the issue of colour. They've made the decision in their own minds, often without a logical rationale, that purity of skin colour is something sacred. Normally, they couch that in terms of social cohesion, but often - as above - they forget to do that and reveal themselves to be clinging to white predominance literally for its own sake.
You wrote a question about a gang of rapists, AOG. Within that thread, you deviated onto the subject of non-white immigrants. You then referred to them, rather than the rapists, as savages. Your choice of tense suggests as much.
A quick summary:
You: When are these gangs going to be cleared from our streets? Is it any wonder people are leaving this once pleasant land?
VHG: Without beating about the bush, many of these crimes are committed by immigrants (or children of immigrants). [Recalling a visit to his local hospital] We were there about 3 hours, and I have to say I was disgusted by the number of immigrants I saw.
You: Yes one has only to look at pictures of school classes on TV news, (mainly when politicians are visiting) to notice that white children are in the minority. I am only pleased that I do not have to take my children to school, and see that they are perhaps the only white children in the class. And before we are accused of being racist, we are not, we are just highlighting white people's concerns.
Me: Some find it odd that others have almost arbitrarily decided to attach colossal importance to the issue of colour. They've made the decision in their own minds, often without a logical rationale, that purity of skin colour is something sacred. Normally, they couch that in terms of social cohesion, but often - as above - they forget to do that and reveal themselves to be clinging to white predominance literally for its own sake.
You [at the start of your next post]: When are you hand wringing leffties going to wake up and admit that it is not the colour of their skin, but their whole culture that makes them the savages they are.
You�d have said �made� them the savages they are, had you been referring to the specific individuals (as they have already been made). Instead you said �makes�, a reference to group that is continuing to produce.
You�re either backtracking now, or you failed to write clearly in the first place.
You�d have said �made� them the savages they are, had you been referring to the specific individuals (as they have already been made). Instead you said �makes�, a reference to group that is continuing to produce.
You�re either backtracking now, or you failed to write clearly in the first place.
