keyplus90, the only people on this site who use the word 'accident' regarding the origins of the universe are religionists, who put that word into the mouths of others.
The only intelligent answer to the question 'How did the universe come about?' is 'We don't know.'
I don't know; you don't know; the President of the Royal Society doesn't know; the Archbish of Cant doesn't know; the Pope doesn't know. Unfortunately, religionists don't like this intellectual humility and so revert to primitive man's idea: If you can't explain something, put it down to some god or other. Hence the proliferation of creation myths across the world's religions.
The fallacy in the creation idea has been well rehearsed on this site before, but, just for you, here is a quick summary:
If nothing can exist without a creator then this must apply to the creator, giving you a creator-of-the-creator. But this can't exist without a creator..... and so on, producing an infinite succession of creators.
Faced with this absurdity, creationists usually cheat by claiming that the rule must be applied only once, to arrive at one creator, and then abandoned.
And you talk of illogic! Best to stick to 'I don't know.' It's safer and also truer.
Octavius as cryptic as ever, I see.