Crosswords0 min ago
question time on police ?
20 Answers
anyone disagree with david starkey ?
i dont
i dont
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Leggendisgod. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Mr Starkey clearly has his own agenda about the Police: he's now rabbiting on about Police in "armoured vehicles in fluorescent jackets with great bulges at the back, the frequency with which you see armed Police, these are radical changes in the style of British policing.blah blah blah..and to say that our Police are not as bad as those in Somaliland really won't do...."
I'm not just giving an opinion, as I said I was also at the miner's strike and know what happened there, too, and it was most certainly not all negative from a policing point of view - it takes two to tango.
And even the Tory's trying to curry favour with the audience by making the outlandish suggestion that they have "independent monitors" at such demos as the G20, filming the Police and the demonstrators!
Talk about trial by telly - even MPs aren't bothering to wait for the IPCC investigation to run its course!
And even the Tory's trying to curry favour with the audience by making the outlandish suggestion that they have "independent monitors" at such demos as the G20, filming the Police and the demonstrators!
Talk about trial by telly - even MPs aren't bothering to wait for the IPCC investigation to run its course!
I've made my views on the Jean Charles de Menezes execution well known on previous posts. It's an outrage that no one has been prosecuted for it. There, never thought I'd say that, did you?
However, and I refuse to take your bait about the miner's strike, as I've already said, I was there and know what happened - were you? Or is it trial by telly again in the kangaroo court? Of course it is.
The vast majority of Police have no more than body armour, a helmet, an ASP, and some CS gas to defend themselves with - the minority only have firearms - fact.
However, and I refuse to take your bait about the miner's strike, as I've already said, I was there and know what happened - were you? Or is it trial by telly again in the kangaroo court? Of course it is.
The vast majority of Police have no more than body armour, a helmet, an ASP, and some CS gas to defend themselves with - the minority only have firearms - fact.
I am not watching QT and I am not a huge fan of the police for several personal reasons, but far too little has been made of police, territorial or otherwise, being on duty with numbers covered up.
You just have to ask why a member of any police force purposely covers his number id before attending any situation.
They are not supposed to and the officer in command either doesn't notice or allows it.
I hope this issue is dealt with at the G20 enquiries - and the requirement for a member of the police force to wear their id is enforced without exception.
You just have to ask why a member of any police force purposely covers his number id before attending any situation.
They are not supposed to and the officer in command either doesn't notice or allows it.
I hope this issue is dealt with at the G20 enquiries - and the requirement for a member of the police force to wear their id is enforced without exception.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --