Donate SIGN UP

Parking

Avatar Image
FrankGalvin | 00:33 Thu 03rd Sep 2009 | Law
4 Answers
I think we can all agree that if a car is parked on a drive with a dropped kerb, or if a car is parked within a lockup adjacent to the street, then it is quite right to expect that access to the drive/garage should be unencumbered.

But what if the drive/garage is not used for vehicular access?

Should the drive or street space adjacent to the garage be left vacant for the 'owner' of the drive/garage to use as a parking space, or is it public property?

My neighbour rents a flat. On the ground level of those flats there are garage spaces. His/her garage space is not used for vehicular access. Adjacent to the garage (a public road) is used for the neighbour to park his/her car there. He/she believes that because they rent/own the garage that the space adjacent to it is exclusively theirs.

Thoughts?

Answers

1 to 4 of 4rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by FrankGalvin. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Are you saying he's blocking access to his own garage but because he doesn't keep a car in the garage you're wondering whether you have just as much right as he does to block vehicular access to his garage?
Question Author
No. He's putting notices on people's windscreens asking them not to park there because the garage space belongs to him (which may or may not be true).

But the thing is this: he/she does not use the garage to store a vehicle. The landlord stores junk in the garage and there is no room for a car. In addition, I have never saw anyone other than the landlord access the garage.

My view is that if the garage space is to be used to store a vehicle then of course, the space in fron of the garage space should be left vacant. I have no problem with doing that.

I have a problem where someone claims to rent a garage, but does not use it or show any signs of using it, but believes that by renting a house (and perhaps a garage space), it also gives him/her preferential parking rights on what is essentially a public highway.
I don't think it matters whether he's got a car in there at the moment. For all you know one day while you are out at work he might clear out some stuff and put a car in there, or a motorbike, and need to be able to get it in/out.
Question Author
Thanks Factor. I just wanted someone else's impartial view, and reluctantly, I suppose you're right. But it is quite annoying since what I'm annoyed at is essentially true - he is using his garage as a means to gain a parking space on a public road.

1 to 4 of 4rss feed