SHOULD HAVE BEEN BEFORE LAST POST - PART ONE!
I am on the support staff for 4 schools, all of which are shut today. One of them I do on a self-employed basis (so I don't get paid if I don't go in), the other 3 I will be paid by. (I am actually doing some work at home - obviously not at the moment! - but there is a limit to what I can do at home). If (say tomorrow) I am unable to get to a school that is open, I will have to make up that time/take it as holiday. AFAIK much the same applies to teachers, though I doubt that many heads would demand the time be made up if a teacher was unable to get to work, despite Electrochem's claims. I don't see what the problem is with school staff getting paid if the school is shut; it's not as if the school is going to be losing money and (by the nature of the job/business) there's a limit to how much work can be done in the holidays (not for me, alas). It's not the fault of the teachers if the schools are shut, so why shouldn't they be paid?
To answer a few questions: The decision to close is made by the head teacher (possibly with some consultation, and following advice from the LEA) and is based on factors such as safety of staff and children in getting to/from school and how many staff are likely to be available. It isn't taken lightly, as they know that there will be childcare problems. Don't forget that there may also be problems with pipes/heating that we don't know about. Most LEA's publish the school closures on their websites, and the BBC radio station will also broadcast school closures. I doubt that many ring parents, but some use Twitter or other automated systems as well. Those who have people capable of quickly altering them may also use their own websites.