If There Was Any Doubt Of Labour's Anti...
News1 min ago
No best answer has yet been selected by Thunderchild. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.1 month, but if you like them 3 months would be polite.It dosn't help not having a contract, you may have to serve an eviction notice with the new contract so they will have to sign an agreement if they want to stay, or leave.
You should be able to get the leagle advice for free to make sure you are fully covered.
i think what they are saying is that without a contract they are similar to squatters and if u offer them the contract they may have the right to refuse signing it, in which case u may have to go through the same lines as if squatters have moved into your house and have them evicted.
I think they are saying u may need to do this as a matter of precaution than an actual threat to show them that a reasonable contract to make things official is needed but without it then they are by law requested to leave, otherwise u cant turf them out without it if they refuse!
My place is rented through a letting agent on behalf of a private owner and i usually get 3 months notice of any rent rises, and they try to keep it under 5% rent rise per 12 months. for example, when we moved in it was originally �300 a month but after a year they increased it to �310 which is less than 5% added on. does that make sense? i think 3 months notice is more than adequate for people to know what to expect so long as it isnt a huge rent rise, and maybe increase it on the same month each year so they unofficially expect it every year. hope this helps