Donate SIGN UP

Where would people stand?

Avatar Image
mollykins | 13:34 Wed 16th Jun 2010 | Jobs & Education
33 Answers
A few days ago, the owners of a local fish and chip shops sold the place and moved out without telling its employers. They went in the next day to find they worked for a different family, luckily they were kept one, but where would they stand if the new owners didn't want them? Should they have been given notice?
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 33 of 33rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by mollykins. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I'm sure she meant employees. They then went in the next day and had a new employer.
Ah get it now 4get, Just reread it and makes more sense now, I suppose if they still have a job it's not a problem
I guess in this instance they knew they were handing over to someone else and that people would be kept on, but still they should have told the employees of a change of management. If the new owners wernt going to keep them on they would be given notice and any redundancy owed to them.
Question Author
I meant employees.
That happened at my dentists practice.

The boss said goodnight see you all tomorrow and never came back. He had sold it to a plc healthplan dentist.

Luckily for them they were all safe initialy but I think that the new owners take them on under the old contracts then change them 'under consultation' in the normal way.
Question Author
According to my dad, who went there for his lunch, one of the people has been made redundant as they are no longer needed.
why didn't he help you cook the chips?
-- answer removed --
Question Author
What are you on about dot? he was at work and went there in his lunch break.

aahhhhh.
Yes, it would more than likely be covered by TUPE. You should be able to find more info on the ACAS site Molly...too knackered to explain myself but, in a nutshell, it's the law covering what happens to employees in the transfer of a business.

It's to protect them from all just being got rid of but there are circumstances in which people can be let go.

Also, at the end of the day, the law is all well and good but the other employment laws and practicalities of taking any action if anything was done wrong also need to be considered.
HADD OCcured to me ... New ownership means nothing to employees, really.
I'm sure they have contracts of employment for this chippie .. yerr .. right.
Was the brand of pickled gherkins changed when the new owners took over?
Question Author
ok thanks.

I dunno, I never had them there before and I haven't been in since.

21 to 33 of 33rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

Where would people stand?

Answer Question >>