ChatterBank8 mins ago
Can i be the first to shoot that barsteward?
39 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by piggynose. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I am entirely with you on that Boo.
I can understand the concept of unsentimentality about animals, but that does not for me stretch as far as hunting and killing them.
My new boss is a huntsman, we discussed it, and obviously see things differently.
Although in his defefnce, he only kills something he can - and does eat. Anything he doesn;t eat with his family is given away or sold to local shops so it's not done simply for sport.
Does that make it OK? No - but he is my boss, I'm keeping schtum on that!
I can understand the concept of unsentimentality about animals, but that does not for me stretch as far as hunting and killing them.
My new boss is a huntsman, we discussed it, and obviously see things differently.
Although in his defefnce, he only kills something he can - and does eat. Anything he doesn;t eat with his family is given away or sold to local shops so it's not done simply for sport.
Does that make it OK? No - but he is my boss, I'm keeping schtum on that!
The hunter will have had express permission from the land owner to shoot the stag. Considering the person concerned is a trophy hunter and will have paid a large sum for the priviledge of killing the Emperor, it follows that they would have known about its existence without the Daily Mail's help.
There I am now, defending the Daily Mail, and the killing of a magnificent beast - I think I'd better lie down.
There I am now, defending the Daily Mail, and the killing of a magnificent beast - I think I'd better lie down.
"whether its because im "city born and bred", I dunno, but I feel deeply uncomfortable about anyone shooting animals for fun and entertainment. Because they're a pest, yes, because they possibly a danger yes and for food yes, but for fun? No sorry, I can't accept that. It's just wrong"
I agree completely.....for food and sustenance is one thing-it's NEED
But for fun and profit...that is something I cannot comprehend. And if this hunter was aware of the location of this stag ( he must have been-as he needed permission from a specific land owner)...then couldn't he have at least waited? Though in my book both he and the landowner are immoral creeps.
I agree completely.....for food and sustenance is one thing-it's NEED
But for fun and profit...that is something I cannot comprehend. And if this hunter was aware of the location of this stag ( he must have been-as he needed permission from a specific land owner)...then couldn't he have at least waited? Though in my book both he and the landowner are immoral creeps.
700,000 deer are culled each year - imagine if the numbers were left to roam, there would not be enough food for them all, the older ones would suffer and die of disease, injury, starvation. Also the genetic diversity would suffer. If this stag (who was culled because of his age) continued to mate with his daughters and granddaughters who knows what this level of inbreeding would produce. Go on - all take a pot shot at me now, but remember, this was not Bambi. Hope you enjoy your steaks, some of which will have come from the best and largest beasts on show at agricultural shows throughout the year.
To add to my post-these words from a Deer Manager on Exmoor say it all
"Some people are avaricious and if it's a super quality deer that's all they see," he said.
The deer was in his prime, he was heading to Exmoor to rut and he should be allowed to carry out his natural functions for another year.
Now he is no longer there to pass on his genes.
He suspected the Emperor had been culled as a trophy because its age - estimated at 10-12 years - meant its meat would have been relatively tough.
He said: "They have to be harvested or culled, but normally you take out the poorest quality or the oldest.
"He didn't qualify."
"Some people are avaricious and if it's a super quality deer that's all they see," he said.
The deer was in his prime, he was heading to Exmoor to rut and he should be allowed to carry out his natural functions for another year.
Now he is no longer there to pass on his genes.
He suspected the Emperor had been culled as a trophy because its age - estimated at 10-12 years - meant its meat would have been relatively tough.
He said: "They have to be harvested or culled, but normally you take out the poorest quality or the oldest.
"He didn't qualify."
There seem to be mixed feelings about this one. On the news yesterday some of the locals were pragmatic about it, deer have to be culled, and the police wouldn't/couldn't say whether it was a trophy hunter or a legitimate cull of an older beast - however the sentiment attaching to this big guy has brought it out in the open. Deer get killed often to keep the numbers down, and as has been said, the beast was legitimately shot by someone with a licence from the landowner. A great shame, especially in the rutting season, which doesn't seem entirely right.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.