Quizzes & Puzzles30 mins ago
Is he too old?
157 Answers
http://tinyurl.com/38gnee9
Elton John and his partner have become parents, with the birth (by a surrogate mother) of a baby boy.
Last year in the Ukraine, they were turned down from adopting because the Ukraine did not accept civil partnerships and also because of his age, he was then quoted as saying :
/// "David always wanted to adopt a child and I always said no because I am 62 and I think because of the travelling I do and the life I have, maybe it wouldn't be fair for the child" ///.
So what's changed?
Elton John and his partner have become parents, with the birth (by a surrogate mother) of a baby boy.
Last year in the Ukraine, they were turned down from adopting because the Ukraine did not accept civil partnerships and also because of his age, he was then quoted as saying :
/// "David always wanted to adopt a child and I always said no because I am 62 and I think because of the travelling I do and the life I have, maybe it wouldn't be fair for the child" ///.
So what's changed?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.eyethenkyew: is your post sarchastic? I don't mean that rudely, I honestly can't tell.
Sammo:
"50yrs ago 2 queers having a kid would have been unheard of.. but now its OK.. So who said its OK?"
Firstly, why do you have to use such insulting language? You must be completely aware that 'queer' is considered a derogatory term nowadays.
Secondly - society did. As an intelligent, self-aware beings, humans have created something called society. Society (like humanity) has its ugly side, but humans have also created something else - reason - to help us improve it. As beings who have discovered reason, it's our responsibility to assess our society and question it at every opportunity. At some point in the C20, we reasoned that two men in a partnership is of no real consequence to anyone else. Later, various studies (as I understand it) indicated that same-sex parents aren't much better or worse than heterosexual ones (much in the same way that single parents aren't). As this thread demonstrates, the debate over whether this means same-sex parents should be able to raise families or not is still ongoing.
You seem fairly surprised that suddenly people are questioning the values society holds on this. This is nothing new and is entirely healthy for reasons I have outlined. If you have failed to keep aware of how society examines itself, that's your own fault.
Sammo:
"50yrs ago 2 queers having a kid would have been unheard of.. but now its OK.. So who said its OK?"
Firstly, why do you have to use such insulting language? You must be completely aware that 'queer' is considered a derogatory term nowadays.
Secondly - society did. As an intelligent, self-aware beings, humans have created something called society. Society (like humanity) has its ugly side, but humans have also created something else - reason - to help us improve it. As beings who have discovered reason, it's our responsibility to assess our society and question it at every opportunity. At some point in the C20, we reasoned that two men in a partnership is of no real consequence to anyone else. Later, various studies (as I understand it) indicated that same-sex parents aren't much better or worse than heterosexual ones (much in the same way that single parents aren't). As this thread demonstrates, the debate over whether this means same-sex parents should be able to raise families or not is still ongoing.
You seem fairly surprised that suddenly people are questioning the values society holds on this. This is nothing new and is entirely healthy for reasons I have outlined. If you have failed to keep aware of how society examines itself, that's your own fault.
-- answer removed --
This matter of Elton John was the subject of a late night radio phone-in.
The presenter was obviously 'pro-gay parenting', anyone who phoned in with their doubts and concerns against gays being parents, were rudely called bigots, homophobic and cretins.These attacks were against perfectly polite callers who had called in to give their particular point of view.
Why is it that one is not allowed to have an opposite opinion on matters such as this, without the need for insults being levied against their person?
The presenter kept referring to the fact that there were hundreds of children waiting to be adopted, what he didn't seem to consider was the fact that Elton John and his partner were using their wealth to buy another human being, this is the frightening part of this whole affair.
If they must have a child they could afford to take a number out for adoption.
The presenter was obviously 'pro-gay parenting', anyone who phoned in with their doubts and concerns against gays being parents, were rudely called bigots, homophobic and cretins.These attacks were against perfectly polite callers who had called in to give their particular point of view.
Why is it that one is not allowed to have an opposite opinion on matters such as this, without the need for insults being levied against their person?
The presenter kept referring to the fact that there were hundreds of children waiting to be adopted, what he didn't seem to consider was the fact that Elton John and his partner were using their wealth to buy another human being, this is the frightening part of this whole affair.
If they must have a child they could afford to take a number out for adoption.
"what he didn't seem to consider was the fact that Elton John and his partner were using their wealth to buy another human being, this is the frightening part of this whole affair"
AOG - you do not have to be rich to have a surrogate baby.
You have to be rich to afford IVF treatment.
And what do you mean by 'buy'???
AOG - you do not have to be rich to have a surrogate baby.
You have to be rich to afford IVF treatment.
And what do you mean by 'buy'???