Family Life5 mins ago
Sightly Odd ?
58 Answers
So Sarah Ferguson has not been invited to the wedding , due to some negative publicity .
But look - The Crown Prince of Bahrain is one of the wedding guests .
Well that's allright then .
But look - The Crown Prince of Bahrain is one of the wedding guests .
Well that's allright then .
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by BertiWooster. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.A year or a day it makes no difference they are still not worth it and it is probably a bit more than 60p a day. If you believe that then thats your problem.
This shindig on it own is cost enough enough in times when we are told we cannot afford vital services.
So when an ambulance is late or if,heaven forbid u should end up in hospital waiting to be seen, or waitng for the fire service to turn up or the police you can keep yourself occupied thinking about the royal wedding and how you might have been served quicker if that money had been spent on what we need instead of keeping the royalists happy.
This shindig on it own is cost enough enough in times when we are told we cannot afford vital services.
So when an ambulance is late or if,heaven forbid u should end up in hospital waiting to be seen, or waitng for the fire service to turn up or the police you can keep yourself occupied thinking about the royal wedding and how you might have been served quicker if that money had been spent on what we need instead of keeping the royalists happy.
So if Sarah Ferguson is not invited -
constantly shooting off mouth to inappropriate media types
constantly moving from one inappropriate liason to another with dodgy individuals
has absolutely no concept of endlessly spending other people's money
fails to provide any worthwile activity, useful or ornamental
utterly fails to present any aspect of royaal conection as anything but a tawdry excuse to behave badly and then bleat about being mistreated ...
Oh, sorry - did I mention i was talking about Prince Andrew??
And he's got a fluffin' invite!!!!!
constantly shooting off mouth to inappropriate media types
constantly moving from one inappropriate liason to another with dodgy individuals
has absolutely no concept of endlessly spending other people's money
fails to provide any worthwile activity, useful or ornamental
utterly fails to present any aspect of royaal conection as anything but a tawdry excuse to behave badly and then bleat about being mistreated ...
Oh, sorry - did I mention i was talking about Prince Andrew??
And he's got a fluffin' invite!!!!!
Well the royalists out in force and no I don't cost u lot a thuing .
Nuice to see the answerbank hasn't changed at all . Dare to disagree with the royalists hard liners and they turn nasty. The Truth hurts doesn't it people.
You like them then you pay but those who don't should be given the option. There was a time when the church was tradional but many commentators on here r happy for that to go. Tradition only matters when it comes to the royal question.
Nuice to see the answerbank hasn't changed at all . Dare to disagree with the royalists hard liners and they turn nasty. The Truth hurts doesn't it people.
You like them then you pay but those who don't should be given the option. There was a time when the church was tradional but many commentators on here r happy for that to go. Tradition only matters when it comes to the royal question.
// I just can't understand how any of you can be bothered to be bothered by any of this..
Personnaly, I dont give a fig about about this wedding - I certainly wont be watching - i've got better things to occupy myself .
The point I was raising was the whole hypocrisy of denying an invite to this particular person for a minor misdemeanour - yet inviting this other person who represents a state that brutally suppress it's citizens ( allegedly ) - all in the name of protocol
Personnaly, I dont give a fig about about this wedding - I certainly wont be watching - i've got better things to occupy myself .
The point I was raising was the whole hypocrisy of denying an invite to this particular person for a minor misdemeanour - yet inviting this other person who represents a state that brutally suppress it's citizens ( allegedly ) - all in the name of protocol
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.