News5 mins ago
the killing
16 Answers
bloody programme. i dedicated a lot of time, effort and loyalty to that programme. i even watched the 2 hour finale last night, despite the advert breaks every 2 minutes.
still have no clue about who dunnit, only to be told that next series starts in a years time. arrgh.
i hate telly.
still have no clue about who dunnit, only to be told that next series starts in a years time. arrgh.
i hate telly.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Ankou. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I think it was Richmond, but there were a lot of unanswered questions, I thought. For instance, if Rosie ran off into the fields, how did he know where to find her - he was in the car. Why did Mitch suddenly leave, they looked as if they had made it up. Very, very bitty. How did he get back home after dumping the car in the lake? I could go on, and on, and on...........
Because we are an hour behind you, and it made it a bit too late to watch as it went out, I have recorded them all every 20 evenings and watched them the following day at an earlier time. Because of this I was able to keep abreast of the plot, well more or less!. I think it was the best TV I've seen for years, and as a bonus, I have fallen madly in love with Pernille!
***Spoilers***
I don't think it was Richmond but everything is designed to point to him. Holder is clearly a plant of some sort. The photo of Richmond in the car on the bridge was fake as the camera was down and Holder used the photo to get the arrest and told his unseen accomplice that it had worked.
There are some inaccuracies such as why was Rosy dressed in normal clothes in the boot of the car if she had been working as a callgirl at the Casino?
My chief suspect is Alan Dale (Richmonds girlfriends dad).
Really enjoyed this series. Very well acted.
I don't think it was Richmond but everything is designed to point to him. Holder is clearly a plant of some sort. The photo of Richmond in the car on the bridge was fake as the camera was down and Holder used the photo to get the arrest and told his unseen accomplice that it had worked.
There are some inaccuracies such as why was Rosy dressed in normal clothes in the boot of the car if she had been working as a callgirl at the Casino?
My chief suspect is Alan Dale (Richmonds girlfriends dad).
Really enjoyed this series. Very well acted.
I watched the Danish subtitled series faithfully every week and really got into it. This Seattle version was always inferior and it said that a different character would be revealed as the killer, However, the last two programmes were a pathetic attempt to round everything up and concluded with a ridiculous and totally inplausible ending. Does anyone else agree that this was inferior to the Danish series? Also there will be a lot of explaining to do if it turns out that Richmond is not guilty. His alibi and soaking clothing the next morning etc. Also what motive did he have? The fetish about drowning was too stupid to even consider plausible.