ChatterBank2 mins ago
Birdsong
39 Answers
Did I skip the boring bits in the book or is this not a good adaptation?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by gettinblurry. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.If they awarded Oscars for "Best Love Sick Gaze" then the lead actor would win it hands down! I really like the actor Joseph Mawle who plays Jack Firebrace (he always reminds me of David Thewlis). I think I looked forward to it too much, because I really enjoyed the book, and now I feel a bit let down. Shame.
It is no comparison with the book, which I love and find unputdownable. The TV adaption was dire. Although all that flicking backwards and forwards does get lost a bit on the screen. The "sex scene" was nowhere as sensuous as it was written. I found it a bit smutty.
I will watch the next bit though, if only to see if it improves.
I will watch the next bit though, if only to see if it improves.
Crikey? Did all you moaners see the same masterly piece of TV I did?! Stunningly filmed; beautifully structured; emotionally charged; and with two leads with looks as charismatic as their performances. Never compare a book with a film - they're two completely different animals. And as for 'slow' if you're looking for 'fast', stick to US cop shows!
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
I remember hearing William Hague name it as his favourite book a few years ago when a list of 100 favourite books was compiled by some publication or other. I recently bought the book from a charity shop but have not started it yet. One thing that does amaze me though is that aged 20, Stephen's first sexual encounter with Isabelle (as depicted on tv) was so incredibly sophisticated and even these days, let alone in 1910, it is obvious that a shy 20 year old would have been a fumbling amateur, and probably still a virgin when he went to France.