ChatterBank22 mins ago
Is Bradford now mostly muslim?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/
Or is there another explanation as to why they'd elect Saddam's bets mate?
Or is there another explanation as to why they'd elect Saddam's bets mate?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by d9f1c7. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
It was only until a few weeks ago that he held a regular Friday night spot on 'Talk Sport' late night radio, until they finally dispensed with his services.
How he was ever allowed to spout his far Left-Wing views on a national radio station for so long, I could never understand.
He never allowed anyone to oppose his views, if they did he shouted them down, belittled them and insulted them, before finally 'cutting them off', yet he issued all kindness and pleasantnesses, towards those who agreed with him.
He was a little like some on Answerbank actually.
How he was ever allowed to spout his far Left-Wing views on a national radio station for so long, I could never understand.
He never allowed anyone to oppose his views, if they did he shouted them down, belittled them and insulted them, before finally 'cutting them off', yet he issued all kindness and pleasantnesses, towards those who agreed with him.
He was a little like some on Answerbank actually.
Gromit "Conveniently forgetting the Conservative candidate vote dropped from 12,800 to 2,800."
What's that got to do with Labour's colossal defeat.? The Conservative was expected to be thrashed . So what new ? They didn't bother to try. Who would in " Once Labour always Labour " Bradford .
I wanted Labour to win, you appear to just want to bash the Tories . There is a big difference.
What's that got to do with Labour's colossal defeat.? The Conservative was expected to be thrashed . So what new ? They didn't bother to try. Who would in " Once Labour always Labour " Bradford .
I wanted Labour to win, you appear to just want to bash the Tories . There is a big difference.
Comparing the Bradford figures from the 2010 General Election and those from last week, as I pointed out elsewhere, the Tory 10,000 drop from 12,000 = an 83% loss of support, whilst the Labour 10,000 drop from 18,000 = a 56% loss of support.
There's no denying that Labour's loss of a parliamentary seat was a major setback, but they can console themselves with the knowledge that the Tory loss of backing was half as bad AGAIN as their own!
There's no denying that Labour's loss of a parliamentary seat was a major setback, but they can console themselves with the knowledge that the Tory loss of backing was half as bad AGAIN as their own!
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.