News2 mins ago
What a surprise!
15 Answers
Received a copy of a magazine I get twice a year from a Friendly Society.
On the front cover are two children, they are my middle granddaughter and my grandson. Absolutely beautiful photograph. Don't know where they got the photo from, never seen it before.
They are all on holiday in Croatia at the moment so I emailed it. Mum and Dad have never seen the photo before, also the 2 children are wearing outfits that look like wet suits. They do not possess wet suits. It is a mystery. I have been in touch with the magazine as I would love a copy of the original, they have promised to come back to me on this.
On the front cover are two children, they are my middle granddaughter and my grandson. Absolutely beautiful photograph. Don't know where they got the photo from, never seen it before.
They are all on holiday in Croatia at the moment so I emailed it. Mum and Dad have never seen the photo before, also the 2 children are wearing outfits that look like wet suits. They do not possess wet suits. It is a mystery. I have been in touch with the magazine as I would love a copy of the original, they have promised to come back to me on this.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Caran. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.What a mystery, was surprised to find there must be more than one magazine of that name....this one does not show children on front cover.
Do hope you get to the bottom of this Caran.
http:// www.for estersf ...rs/f orester -magazi ne/
Do hope you get to the bottom of this Caran.
http://
My great niece appeared on the front cover of a 'horsey' mag once showing her astride her horse going over a jump.
My niece applied for a copy of the original but was told it could not be released as it was the copyright of the photographer.
She was a minor at the time and no permission was sought either to take the photo or to publish.
My niece applied for a copy of the original but was told it could not be released as it was the copyright of the photographer.
She was a minor at the time and no permission was sought either to take the photo or to publish.