What is Obama hiding?

[KerrAvon]

by having his college and passport records sealed. Surely he's inviting the world to believe he has something to hide?

[LazyGun]

@KerrAvon

You posted this "It's not their business but he is the president he surely must expect more scrutiny than anyone else. When someone spends milions to prevent access to records, suspicion is innevitable. I have no knowledge that Romney's records are similarly supressed. If this was GWB all you guys would be wailing like banshees, you know you would. It's your man so he must be clean.

All I'm saying is that if there is nothing to hide then wheel out the recs and let's put this to bed."

You make several unsubstantiated assertions in this defence of the nutters blathering on about unavailable records.
1 Obama has "spent millions" suppressing records.Where is your evidence that this has happened?
2."I have no knowledge that Romneys records are suppressed" - Well get some then! The supposition that there is some sort of conspiracy only begins to get any relevance if you can demonstrate that the other candidates records are completely accessible, published or open - and guess what? you cant.
3.No, I would not be wailing about suppression of records re GWB unless it was relevant or demonstrable that their was some sort of conspiracy of silence - and you and those who make these conditions and claims can do nothing of the sort. You just assert without evidence.

[KerrAvon]

LG:
I'm not asserting anything. I'd just think it looks very suspicious that's all. Why do I need to find evidence of Romney's records being supressed? That's not my assertion.

[LazyGun]

@KerrAvon - ":
I'm not asserting anything. I'd just think it looks very suspicious that's all. Why do I need to find evidence of Romney's records being supressed? That's not my assertion"

The title of your thread is an example of asserting by inference. Your question - Is Obama hiding anything- only starts to have any beginning of relevance if you can demonstrate that Obama is actively concealing something that the other candidate -Romney- has made plain, public, and transparent. You cannot.

You also made the assertion, unsubstantiated, that Obama had spent millions in actively suppressing the release of this information.("When someone spends milions to prevent access to records, suspicion is innevitable.") Again no evidence.

So, just mudslinging, initiated by the conspiracy theorists.

[dotty.]

who cares what a draft dodger like trump wants to see, though at least it distracts him from carving up the scottish coastline