Should Children Under 16 Be Barred From...
News14 mins ago
No best answer has yet been selected by Drusilla. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Whatever she says Drusilla, there is a very distinct difference in her face that has nothing to do with age and everything to do with surgery. Lack of expression, especially around the eyes and that very strange 'blank' look...
Sad really, even though the advert makes me want to scream she is naturally beautiful and didn't need any enhancement.
I agree Cetti. The images from 2002 show a much more vibrant and mobile face and she is stunning. I also think its sad because her bone structure was always good enough to get her through maturity without resorting to surgery. Still, she's 47 and I suppose the pressures in Hollywood make even beautiful women panic about their looks. It is sad!!