Donate SIGN UP

Answers

1 to 9 of 9rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by DJHawkes. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
The Eurovision Song Contest used to have a jury-only voting system.
Then it changed to audience-participation via tele-voting only.
But that wasn't ideal either as it meant ex-pats abroad could still vote for their own country, and plainly did so - for example Estonia suddenly started giving 10 points to Russia.
So a few years ago they introduced a part-jury part-televoting system which seems to have helped.
The problem is it that I've never seen an explanation of how that actually worked.
I actually suspect that there's very little if any actual bribery. To have any real overall effect it would need to be on a major scale. But on the other hand maybe the bribers are too stupid to realise that.
Well I never, what ever next !.
Question Author
I'm more surprised that people ever thought it was ligit than the fact they are investigating the alleged bribes
Oh what a surprise
LOL, it ain't been legit since Bucks Fizz won it dot !.
It's hard to see what the point is in Azerbaijan bribing the Maltese jury, for example. Or for that matter Russia bribing Azerbaijan. I suppose it might aid the respectability of the voting figures to prevent the embarrassment of the dreaded nul points
...given all countries are supposed to use televoting for 50% of the votes, if there was fixing going on it would also involve defrauding the televoters. Quite a serious issue in theory.
Question Author
there's nowt serious about eurovision , lol
They are really taking the show seriously enough to bother with an investigation.

Come on !!

1 to 9 of 9rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Ha Ha, Like We Didn't Know Already!

Answer Question >>