Lies !

[whiskeryron]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2560428/Police-claim-new-video-proves-Plebgate-PC-telling-truth-Sources-say-footage-supports-accusation-pub

WR.

[anotheoldgit]

By whom, can you be a little more specific?

[sandyRoe]

These new witnesses, I do hope they're not off-duty policewomen.

[Baldric]

Clear enough to me, but I read the link!

[anotheoldgit]

Baldric

/// Clear enough to me, but I read the link! ///

And so did I, but since the OP has failed to get off the fence, perhaps you can prove something that I seemed to have clearly missed.

[Baldric]

//A police source familiar with the new footage, which was filmed from Richmond House, the offices of Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt, said: ‘You can see two women walking past when Mitchell argued with Rowland//

[Gromit]

It is puzzling that the CCTV shown on Channel 4 showed no witnesses shocked near the gate at the time the incident was unfolding. It did show two women walking past, but they were a long way from the gates, they didn't stop, they didn't look and showed no signs of being shocked.
And now footage from another angle apparently (because we have not seen it) shows two women.
How can footage of the same scene have people appearing and disappearing? Why has the new footage only just come to light after all this time? Should someone be prosecuted for withholding vital evidence?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUFfDp58yTU&feature=youtube_gdata_player

[whiskeryron]

//
Mark as Best Answer
Baldric

/// Clear enough to me, but I read the link! ///

And so did I, but since the OP has failed to get off the fence, perhaps you can prove something that I seemed to have clearly missed

Come on aog don't be so naive.

WR.

[anotheoldgit]

whiskeryron

Come on Ron, tell us who you think is lying?

[anotheoldgit]

/// Last year, PC Rowland was cleared of lying by the Crown Prosecution Service, which said the Channel 4 footage ‘did not show the full picture’ and that other CCTV video was ‘consistent’ with Rowland’s story. ///

Well it seems that PC Rowlans was not the one lying, since he was cleared of the accusations that he was.

[Gromit]

AOG
The CPS said there was insufficient evidence that Rowland lied. Their full statement is here.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/plebgate-crown-prosecution-service-statement-2852580

It was Roland who wrote that several members of the public witnessed th row and were shocked. However, the Channel 4 footage above did not show several shocked witnesses. That account was clearly a lie, but the CPS glossed over that. The central claim, that Mitchell used the word pleb could not be prosecuted because no audio recording was made and it cannot be proved one way or another.

Rowland has never been interviewed under caution. Mitchell wants to put him in the witness box under oath in his libel action against the Sun. Rowland is counter suing Mitchell for libel, so this story still has a long time to run.

[ludwig]

The only thing thing that's clear about this ridiculous case, is that everyone involved is obnoxious.

Can't we just put them all in jail and have done with it?