Quizzes & Puzzles12 mins ago
911 consipracy
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by hugoboss. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Hi loosehead, well I did address hugoboss only because as I already know everybody else here has their own fixed idea of the 911 thing.
I cannot be bothered to keep pushing things which will not move and my view of the world tends to be that if I see something which is not correct based on my experience and view of reality I try to push people I know into thinking about it, after that if they don't want to take notice or do research then OK with me.
I suppose you also don't believe the peak oil scenario and world energy depletion debate which is being played out on the web and increasingly on the worlds media. That is another good subject for all the ''I don't believe it'' people around.
Just because someone takes a different view to you does not mean that they are a. brainwashed, or b unthinking sheep.
Debating on the basis of fact is far more preferable than rather infantile name calling.
Hi lazyGun, you know the bigest problem with getting serious thinking done on the 911 subject is exactly what you said, ''conspiracy theories''
98% of the people I talk too here and IRL will have the immediate reaction to say conspiracy theory, or why would someone do it, or how could it be possible etc... etc... and then they just will not examine the situation logically at all. you only have to look at some of the above comments to see what happens, insults etc..
I have tried to say to many people - forget all that rubbish, forget the politics and terrorism etc.. just look at the technical details of 911 from an engineering point of view, examine the technical evidence without bias and make a logical conclusion. My own conclusion is quite simple, that the WTC1, WTC2, WTC7 buildings did not just fall down, they were brought down by explosives planted in the buildings - Who Planted them is totally different question which I have no idea about and don't want to get involved in - the us govt ?? the terrorists ?? crooks after the insurance money ?? who knows. But I am sure the buildings did not just fall down.
Here's how it worked Qappy, It's a bit long answers all the questions about the collapse, it's by proper engineers:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/collapse.html
Hi Loosehead, thanks for the link but I have seen that stuff before and I could show you many sites with the opposite analysis, I think that we should just agree to differ, you keep your view of reality and I will keep mine.
Hold the presses, I just saw THIS this news item about a CNN interview on monday with the actor Charlie Sheen.
for 'loosehead'...
im not neccesarrily agreeing with the 911 theory, but to debunk your qoute
'conspiracy theorists make up this sh1t so they can sell their books and DVD's its a marketting exersize'
Loose change contains a copyright disclaimer and actively encourages the FREE distribution of the DVD to anyone wanting to see it. Its website offers FREE copies to anyone in New York on 911 (they even pay postage).......
Strangest marketing exercise ive ever seen.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.