News1 min ago
Would You Sue?
37 Answers
After I had got out of my car I was struck on my hand by an adult cyclist as he rode past. I suffered a very painful hand injury which will leave a small but permanent scar. Although there was no damage to my car and I haven't incurred any financial loss at all, my insurance company has advised me that I should still be entitled to compensation just for my injury. With that in mind, I'm considering suing the cyclist for damages. I am just wondering though if this seems the right thing to do as this hasn't actually cost me anything financially, only the painful hand injury and the small scar it will leave. I don't need any legal advice, I would just like to know your opinions really. So if this had happened to you, would you sue the cyclist?
Answers
no ..don't think so....sh**te happens...as long as it does not affect your ability to earn a living... unfortunate accident...
19:50 Mon 28th Jul 2014
The OP was hit on the hand AFTER she got out of the car, not while she was getting out,so I doubt it was her fault. However, I wouldn't Sue unless you lost work or had medical costs to pay. If you had opened your door and knocked the cyclist off his bike then you would have been liable and he would and should Sue but this sounds to me like an unfortunate accident
To those of you who seem to assume that I am at fault, for your information I am NOT! You just seem to have assumed exactly how this happened. You don't know the full facts of my case and I was not asking you opinion about who was to blame. I explained this situation in very brief detail and was only asking for your opinions on whether it would be worth claiming against the cyclist. If you don't think it would be worth me suing the cyclist that's fine, thank you for your opinion, but don't just assume that I am to blame when you don't know the full facts.
If it's a personal injury claim, it's irrelevant that you've had no financial loss, laura - the claim is for your pain and suffering, future prognosis etc. You have three years to initiate a claim, that's three years from the date of the accident. If as you say the cyclist was fully to blame and there is no contributory negligence on your part, then why not try to bring a case for negligence against him? Your insurance company should appoint legal representation for you if you have legal cover either on your motor policy or your household insurance policy. The claim may not succeed, if the cyclist has no funds, but if I were in your position, I would claim.