Australia: Anti-Muslim Backlash

[agchristie]

Following the arrests last week in the country there is growing unrest. As important as it is to prevent radicalisation, is it not also essential to protect the law abiding Islamic following from abuse and damage to property? We are seeing more attacks in the UK too. Is it now possible to stop this escalation of tensions?

http://m.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/we-are-the-ones-being-terrorised-muslims-say-20140920-10jdkw.html

[Brenden]

All muslims want an global islamic rule, do not be fooled into thinking their are moderates.

[naomi24]

I see the explanation I gave at 22:42 Sun 21st Sep of the automatically starred out word in my post at 22:39 Sun 21st Sep has also been starred out – manually I presume – it was there when I posted. Since the replacement stars could easily be misconstrued as profanity, and since I wouldn’t want the reader to gain an erroneous impression of the language I employ, I want to make it clear that the word is to be found in any dictionary and was appropriate to the subject matter – the turmoil in the Middle East – ‘blood’ with a ‘y’ on the end – meaning brutal, gory, etc., etc.

[keyplus90]

People who are asking that why law abiding Muslims do not stop these people have forgotten that USA and Co are now attacking the same people they armed, funded and were going to fight alongside last year.

All of these matters would stop as soon as Americans will learn that their dream of policing the world, and creation of the foot soldiers to suit their purpose is not making world any safer. But right now sale of weapons is at the highest so why not carry on?

[naomi24]

Keyplus, //All of these matters would stop as soon as Americans will learn that their dream of policing the world, and creation of the foot soldiers to suit their purpose is not making world any safer.//

Would "all of these matters" stop? How do you know?

[vulcan42]

keyplus perhaps if the law abiding Muslims had been more outspoken in the past, America might not have needed to police the world..

[tamborine]

Not so, keyplus

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/08/26/world/africa/egypt-and-united-arab-emirates-said-to-have-secretly-carried-out-libya-airstrikes.html?_r=0&referrer=

[askyourgran]

The terrorists are being funded by rich Arab states, it has little to do with America's imperialism, that is an excuse, it is more to do with Islam trying to force it's religion upon the rest of the world. It has insiduously made inroads into the fabric of all countries and is intent on trying to force Sharia law and it's arcane practices into modern day societies. Tony Blair's idea of a multiracial society has not worked, it was Blair and Bush that opened this can of worms by invading their countries, imo he should be shot. The idea that people living in a Christian country could be swayed into following Islam after watching the atrocities by the jihadists beggars belief. Only the disaffected young muslims who are in awe of their brother Islamists are foolish enough to join them at the cost of their lives or their citizenship in Britain. The unrest in Britain and other countries is being caused not just by the fanatical Muslims but by the lack of integration of the ordinary Muslim people who have made a home here and made no effort to adapt. This latest report of the tensions in Australia proves everyone is fed up of pandering to them, allowing special priviliges. It is time to stop them and their murderous posturing. Jailing them is not good enough, much stiffer penalties should be in place, human rights do not apply to those animals, they need to be made an example of 'An eye for and eye' in my book.

[ChillDoubt]

All of these matters would stop as soon as Americans will learn that their dream of policing the world, and creation of the foot soldiers to suit their purpose is not making world any safer.
--------------------
Utter rubbish. The US invariably ends up policing because it feels oliged to. UN troops are about as useful as a handbrake on a canoe, the Arab League have generally in the past been unwilling to commit any troops to the cause hence they always look to the US to 'do the decent thing' and step in.
Until now Obama has been reluctant, instead wanting them to get involved and sort their own problems for once but they never do, so it falls on the superpower.
Strangely, they never ask Russia or China, it's always the US. Ask yourself why is that?

[keyplus90]

Ok, fine. I will agree with each and every one who did not like my post or comments. And let's see if USA and Co can make this world a peaceful place to live in by giving peeople waepons and then attacking same people. One thing is sure, weapons sale is booming so CIA are doing their bit to boost American economy.

[naomi24]

Keyplus, the suppliers are not responsible for pulling the trigger. Again, according to you, it's someone else's fault.

[keyplus90]

http://www.bilalabdulkareem.com/adnani/

[naomi24]

Keyplus, your link doesn't work.