When people are up for a knighthood,is their past not scrutinized thoroughly,and if so has someone slipped up badly in regards to those 2 perverted *** who I will not name
a) there is no guarantee one will find problems with someone's past when checked. b) even if something is found it is always a case of who you know and whether they will keep the "secret" quiet.
Take a moment to consider just how many awards are given in each honours list, plus those awards that aren't listed. Then consider how much it would cost the tax payer for each of those individuals to be vetted prior to receiving their award.
Do you really think that would be a wise use of tax payers money and resources?
Honours can be revoked. There was a case a few years back of a headmistress who was made a Dame, later to be convictied of embezzlement. Her damehood was revoked.
BlackadderV - "Honours can be revoked. There was a case a few years back of a headmistress who was made a Dame, later to be convictied of embezzlement. Her damehood was revoked."
Yes - the Establishment takes crimes of finance seriously.
Jeffrey Archer merely perjured himself into a prison cell, but his peerage remains intact.