Crosswords4 mins ago
Could This Be One Reason Why English Job Seekers Cannot Find Work?
19 Answers
http:// www.exp ress.co .uk/new s/uk/52 0811/Cl eaner-w anted-w ho-spea k-Polis h
/// "Candidates who can speak both English and Polish preferred to be able to communicate with the other members of staff." ///
Would it have been easier if their adverts for cleaners stated that all applicants should be able to speak English?
/// "Candidates who can speak both English and Polish preferred to be able to communicate with the other members of staff." ///
Would it have been easier if their adverts for cleaners stated that all applicants should be able to speak English?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
We need to a be a tad more like France:
http:// www.the local.f r/20111 012/145 6
If you intend to live and work here you either speak the indigenous language or you GTFO, IMHO.
http://
If you intend to live and work here you either speak the indigenous language or you GTFO, IMHO.
PiperH
/// No this is not the reason why English job seekers cannot find work. ///
/// The majority of those in long term unemployment do not want to work or do not want to do jobs they see as demeaning, and are more than happy to sit back and carrying on taking the benefit cheques. ///
We have heard this all before and has been a subject for many posts.
Read my headline you will then notice that this includes the two words "ONE REASON" then perhaps you will then go on to address this particular question.
/// No this is not the reason why English job seekers cannot find work. ///
/// The majority of those in long term unemployment do not want to work or do not want to do jobs they see as demeaning, and are more than happy to sit back and carrying on taking the benefit cheques. ///
We have heard this all before and has been a subject for many posts.
Read my headline you will then notice that this includes the two words "ONE REASON" then perhaps you will then go on to address this particular question.
One of my daughters is senior management in housekeeping with a large chain of hotels. She says its very rare for any English people to apply for the cleaning jobs and when they do they don't last very long, take days off without warning and flatly refuse overtime. On the contrary the Polish workers do a good job will see a job through to the end and don't moan when they are asked to stay back in an emergency. Most have a smattering of English and pick it up quickly and management have phrase books. Until we come out of the EU we will just have to put up with it, if I wanted to go to Greece to work I would not have to prove I could speak Greek, we are all in the same boat.
Retrochic
/// if I wanted to go to Greece to work I would not have to prove I could speak Greek, ///
Only if the Greeks did not include in their recruitment adverts, " Candidates who can speak both Greek and English preferred to be able to communicate with the other members of staff"
/// we are all in the same boat. ///
Maybe an unfortunate choice of words, when attached to immigration.
/// if I wanted to go to Greece to work I would not have to prove I could speak Greek, ///
Only if the Greeks did not include in their recruitment adverts, " Candidates who can speak both Greek and English preferred to be able to communicate with the other members of staff"
/// we are all in the same boat. ///
Maybe an unfortunate choice of words, when attached to immigration.
The English language currently has a vacancy for a noun which means:-
a rare qualification or skill or prior experience, specified in a job advert so as to restrict the number of candidates to a manageable amount. This also makes an internal promotion possible to arrange when EU-wide advertising of the post is mandatory since only someone inside the organisation can have accrued the required experience in 'X'.
MacGuffin will have to do, for now.
a rare qualification or skill or prior experience, specified in a job advert so as to restrict the number of candidates to a manageable amount. This also makes an internal promotion possible to arrange when EU-wide advertising of the post is mandatory since only someone inside the organisation can have accrued the required experience in 'X'.
MacGuffin will have to do, for now.
For goodness sake, how long are we going to keep throwing taxpayers money at people who are not prepared to accept jobs that are offered to them ? In the days of the big depression (1920s) my father & many more like him would take any job that was available in order to put food on the table. I am absolutely not a Tory voter ( have voted Labour all my life) but enough is enough. Lets try harder to get the jobless back into work.
Maybe you should vote conservative Whiskery
http:// www.the guardia n.com/s ociety/ 2014/se p/28/da vid-cam eron-we lfare-y outh-un employm ent
http://
@whiskeyron
I have a degree but, after graduating, discovered that all the jobs - even testing blood for AIDS (at the height of the 80s scare) - were over subscribed with applicants. (back at school I fell for advice about the coming biotechnology boom, as did thousands of others who all graduated at the same time, with not enough vacancies to go around: there never was this boom).
With only a Desmond, I had no hope of selection. After that, jobs always specified "5 years' experience in HPLC" or other specialist kit which you can't learn without being in a job. At 21,22, I was in the same trap as a school leaver.
I still needed to pay the rent so took jobs that hired with no questions - restaurant, delivering parcels etc.
Ever afterwards, I'd go to tech job interviews and they'd either give me that look or say it out loud :- "drifter".
That's what you get when you take "any old job". I cannot disrecommend it enough.
No matter how much you may admire people who take what's given, unless you work in HR, it counts for nothing.
"What's on his CV?",
"Cleaner, mostly"
"Why's he applying for an admin job?"
"File it under B".
So, if you want to be a cleaner -for life- take that job in the window, don't hold out for anything better.
I have a degree but, after graduating, discovered that all the jobs - even testing blood for AIDS (at the height of the 80s scare) - were over subscribed with applicants. (back at school I fell for advice about the coming biotechnology boom, as did thousands of others who all graduated at the same time, with not enough vacancies to go around: there never was this boom).
With only a Desmond, I had no hope of selection. After that, jobs always specified "5 years' experience in HPLC" or other specialist kit which you can't learn without being in a job. At 21,22, I was in the same trap as a school leaver.
I still needed to pay the rent so took jobs that hired with no questions - restaurant, delivering parcels etc.
Ever afterwards, I'd go to tech job interviews and they'd either give me that look or say it out loud :- "drifter".
That's what you get when you take "any old job". I cannot disrecommend it enough.
No matter how much you may admire people who take what's given, unless you work in HR, it counts for nothing.
"What's on his CV?",
"Cleaner, mostly"
"Why's he applying for an admin job?"
"File it under B".
So, if you want to be a cleaner -for life- take that job in the window, don't hold out for anything better.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.