Donate SIGN UP

Cover Versions

Avatar Image
Meadowgrover | 08:47 Wed 17th Dec 2003 | Music
4 Answers
If a songwriter records his own song after someone else has already recorded it, does this still count as a 'cover'.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 4 of 4rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Meadowgrover. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
For the purposes of http://www.coversproject.com it does, rather bizarrely. But I wouldn't class it as a cover myself.
For the purposes of the Performing Rights Society it doesn't...They recognise two original versions (they have to always split songs for royalties purposes..money goes to both writer and performer)....The original version of a song is the one that the songwriter(s) do(es) when it is finished regardless of the intent of the songwriter to commit it to tape himself...the next "original" version is the first commercially recorded and released version of the song....This used to be a very close run thing in the fifties with a few major artists all recording and releasing the same songs within a matter of days....Wouldn't it be fun to have Will Young, G--G--Gareth G--G--Gates and maybe Darius Danesh all do the same song and let the public decide who did the best version??

PS Pete Waterman if you're reading this I have copyright on that idea !!!

Surely it makes no difference to the PRS who recorded it first, ONLY who wrote it?
The PRS sends out two cheques...one for the performer and one for the songwriter.....Songwriter gets a larger chunk.

1 to 4 of 4rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Cover Versions

Answer Question >>