ChatterBank3 mins ago
Wouldnt It Be Far Cheaper ?....
12 Answers
Cant find a new link but heard it on the radio earlier...
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -englan d-kent- 3380392 8
to package him up and to take him straight back to Calais and drop him off there...than keep him here,what with the adjourned case and all the other costs involved down the line ( pun intended)....hes got no chance of beng deported and he probably knows it...the leftie oooman rights lawyers will no doubt be on a nice earner keeping him here....
http://
to package him up and to take him straight back to Calais and drop him off there...than keep him here,what with the adjourned case and all the other costs involved down the line ( pun intended)....hes got no chance of beng deported and he probably knows it...the leftie oooman rights lawyers will no doubt be on a nice earner keeping him here....
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by bazwillrun. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ."The fact that they have had to resort to a 150 year-old Act in order to charge him with anything does not put the authorities in a very good light."
true..but I still dont want him to be allowed to stay here
I am surprised theres nothing else they could have come up with, like entering the UK illegally, no docs or soemthing
true..but I still dont want him to be allowed to stay here
I am surprised theres nothing else they could have come up with, like entering the UK illegally, no docs or soemthing
Actually mushroom the rules are that he should have presented himself to the authorities in the first safe haven he arrived in. This was definitely not the UK and was probably not France. Under the rules his status now is that he has entered the UK without leave and, having arrived from a safe country he has no claim for asylum. Of course we do not use the benefits of those rules (which would enable us to return him to France) and he will remain here forevermore. He will spend a short time in the chokey until he is tried. If convicted I doubt the penalty will be that great and he will be released to go on his way.
I think that the wider implications are more disturbing. This guy is an asylum seeker (economic migrant) but what if he had been a suicide bomber? Think of the catastrophic destruction he could have caused. I was planning my first ever trip on Eurostar but have decided to stick with flying or the ferry.
It has been reported that this man is a Sudanese national who cannot speak English, so that rules out the general excuse that he chose to come to England because he can speak English.
So he is yet another economic illegal immigrant, who is attracted to the rich pickings he can scrounge from us and become yet another burden to the British tax payer.
He is not escaping from the Libyan war zone, so should therefore be sent packing back to the Sudan forthwith.
So he is yet another economic illegal immigrant, who is attracted to the rich pickings he can scrounge from us and become yet another burden to the British tax payer.
He is not escaping from the Libyan war zone, so should therefore be sent packing back to the Sudan forthwith.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.