BRING BACK NOK!!!! support this campaign

[suzie1]

Please i miss him.he was fun. Please Mr Ed :-( it wont be fun coming on here without Nok being here.

[benny3008]

HAS HE BEEN BANNED???!!!

[sara3]

weren't you the one posting "you asked for it" earlier?

[suzie1]

Which others!!!! Ed its no fun here tonight!

[suzie1]

i was kidding with him, i always do he brings the naughty side out of me, i dont mean it, i want him back on site....Now Ed!!!! ok sara, r u happy now lovey.

[dothawkes31]

suzie you need to learn the art o subtle persuasion, the ed is not a fan of pro-active dissent.

[suzie1]

Hey gorgeus sexy Ed, love you, now please can Nok come back, promise he'll be good.................is that better dot-will ed listen now

[tamborine]

Ed cant take the competition

[suzie1]

whats SAB tony

[Mamyalynne]

He`s there I swear he is!!

[suzie1]

mam where is he

[Mamyalynne]

Sports answerbank

[Dris]

You'll be next given what I read today from one of the threads yesterday.
How dare you say that I harboured a beaten ex wife of Tiggy Legge-Bourke-you bare faced effing liar !!!!!!!!
I have EMailed the Ed re this scrulillous post -youve got a nerve.

[S_C]

No_Knowledge_ was a characture there is no denying that.

i sadly saw the start of the problem that caused him to transgress the Site Rules.
Someone was posting under the name " No_Knowledge " and the post i saw and reported was sad to say the least.
Who it was that was posting under the almost identical name i have no idea.

It being such an obvious attack on him must have seemed extremely personal to the actual No_Knowlegde_ , i can only imagine how his reaction went for him to get banned as i myself didnt see how far that reaction went.

Personaly i found a lot of his posts funny and i also feel that the " ED " must feel justified in the ban , as such matters as " cloning and attacks " are obviously better left in the hands of the site administrators.

However with all that said maybe the " ED " would reconsider the ban after a cooling of period, with the consideration of such attacks oviously seeming extremely personal the " victim" of such attacks and any retaliation could be placed under the heading of heat of the moment.

Personaly i would have no objection to seeing No_knowledge_ back here , however as a mear observer in this matter must concede to the administrators choice of action.

[snags]

''BRING BACK NOK!!!!''

You are assuming this site is run as a democracy...

For what it's worth I'd like to see NoK back too...

[Henkle]

Spare Ed has previously stated this site is NOT a democracy. That being the case, any pleas for NOK's reinstatement will fall on deaf ears. At best, we can hope senior Ed will be talking to junior Ed regarding their over zealous banning, but don't hold your breath for any U-turns.

[snags]

''Spare Ed has previously stated this site is NOT a democracy''

You didn't pick up on the sarcasm in my previous post then...

[Henkle]

Yeah I did snags, just agreeing with you. Thought I'd add my little bit and show some support.... For what it's worth.