Ct Scan

[annieigma]

any one know how much info a CT scan can provide? Male relative had stomach pains radiating down to testicles, and swelling and pain in sides. Went for a CT scan, result was two hernias, one either side. The doc had asked for a scan because she thought it was kidney stones or possibly prostrate problem. Would the scan have shown if there were other problems, as it found the hernias and was looking for stones?

[Togo]

A ct scan can highlight all internal problems just about. (I have had at least 8) The thing is the consultant or scan analyst may be looking for something in particular and could miss something that is not obvious. However the scans are kept and can be referred back to.

[Sqad]

In a nutshell, a CT scan takes less time and is less expensive than an MRI scan. An MRI is used for more discreet lesions particularly around the nerves and brain, but for more "bulky" lesions (tumours etc) a CT scan is more appropriate.One would not need either for the diagnosis of herniae.In asnwer to your question...yes a CT scan would have shown other problems despite looking for kidney stones based on my provisos above.
It is a question of professional judgement as to which investigation to use..MRI or CT.

[anthro-nerd]

Sqad, am I right in thinking a CT scan shows 'masses', but not the nature of the cells... and an MRI provides much more detail?

[Sqad]

Anthro......neither shows the "nature" of the cells only a biopsy would do that.
Both CT and MRI shows "masses.".The shape and position of the masses "might" suggest a diagnosis, but this would have to be confirmed by biopsy.
Yes....in general terms you are correct Anthro an MRI is more detailed.