Quizzes & Puzzles6 mins ago
Chris Packham
27 Answers
We went to see Chris Packham last night; he gave a public lecture at the local uni which was brilliant. As always, he was as entertaining as he was knowledgeable which made for a perfect evening out.
Still just a little bit awestruck :-)
Still just a little bit awestruck :-)
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Maydup. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Here's the list of dates if anyone else is interested in catching him locally
http://www.chrispackh...ris_Packham_Talks.htm
http://www.chrispackh...ris_Packham_Talks.htm
Ladybirder I have. I didn't. The reason that the New Forest has survived to modern times (and other similar places) is that they have changed with the times and ordinary people can use and enjoy them. To ban the public from all the areas that could be used by ground nesting birds would close the vast majority of the Forest for about a third of the year. And who would exclude the cattle, deer and ponies, also the foxes and badgers who eat the eggs and chicks of ground nesting birds as do owls and hawks?
Areas of the Forest are protected by being closed during the nesting season, just not the whole forest. People like myself who go to the forest every day rain or shine yes to exercise our dogs are unpaid carers. We report dumped and burning cars and injured animals, pick up litter and generally keep an eye on "our areas"
Its a balance. Less birds in the wild; more birds in gardens. Less areas given over to wildlife; more people caring for those areas.
(Picks up soapbox and shuffles off)
Areas of the Forest are protected by being closed during the nesting season, just not the whole forest. People like myself who go to the forest every day rain or shine yes to exercise our dogs are unpaid carers. We report dumped and burning cars and injured animals, pick up litter and generally keep an eye on "our areas"
Its a balance. Less birds in the wild; more birds in gardens. Less areas given over to wildlife; more people caring for those areas.
(Picks up soapbox and shuffles off)
He didn't suggest banning the public, he suggested managing the New Forest to allow it to recover. Its all in your own link woofgang and I can't see how this can be so misinterpreted.
http://www.telegraph....st-could-be-lost.html
I also read his comments about the panda. He did admit to being a bit flippant, but did say that we can no longer afford the campaign to save the panda. The amount of money spent already and the amount of money we are likely to spend on this unsuccessful mission could be used to much better effect elsewhere now. Again, I don't see why he can't say that without being attacked from all fronts! He's not about supporting things just because they're cute or popular, he's a realist that's all.
http://www.telegraph....st-could-be-lost.html
I also read his comments about the panda. He did admit to being a bit flippant, but did say that we can no longer afford the campaign to save the panda. The amount of money spent already and the amount of money we are likely to spend on this unsuccessful mission could be used to much better effect elsewhere now. Again, I don't see why he can't say that without being attacked from all fronts! He's not about supporting things just because they're cute or popular, he's a realist that's all.
Quoted from the article
"He has come up with a number of solutions to preserve the beauty of the New Forest.
He has suggested restricting access to certain sensitive areas of the woodland and preventing dogs from entering places inhabited by ground-nesting birds."
What isn't mentioned is that this would be most of the forest from the beginning of march to the end of July. This would be if he only meant the nesting season, if he meant exclusion all year round it would be even more drastic.
"He has come up with a number of solutions to preserve the beauty of the New Forest.
He has suggested restricting access to certain sensitive areas of the woodland and preventing dogs from entering places inhabited by ground-nesting birds."
What isn't mentioned is that this would be most of the forest from the beginning of march to the end of July. This would be if he only meant the nesting season, if he meant exclusion all year round it would be even more drastic.