The Richard III society in my experience seek to give a balanced view of the life and career of Richard III, previously Richard Duke of Gloucester. Mike11111 seems to have missed the fact that he was his brother's right hand man and extremely well thought of prior to the spin doctor nonsense of the Tudors. He was an excellent general, lived for many years in Yorkshire keeping order in the north for Edward IV, was known as a good diplomat, was considered pious and generous and was loyal to a fault. When his brother unexpectedly died, he was left with Elizabeth Woodville's rabidly ambitious family to deal with and did so effectively. He then assumed the throne which at the time was in the best interests of the country ( child Kings never fair well and neither does the nation under their rule). what happened or didn't happen to the princes in the tower is a subject for conjecture, but what happened on Bosworth field was a brave King died leading his troops against usurpers and traitors. There's nothing remotely Kraylike about Richard Plantagenet he was merely a man, some would say a good man, of his time.