ChatterBank2 mins ago
G20: Ian Tomlinson
The jury in this case have returned an 'unlawful killing verdict. I am so pleased and hope that the officer involved will face criminal proceedings. For too long, thugs within the police force have been getting away with things like this. Why the CPS initially said that there was insufficient evidence to prosecute this officer is beyond me. Who else would get away with using a weapon against a strolling man, hands in pockets, and then pushing him violently, with all of this caught on camera?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Arti. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I know someone who was at the inquest for several days whilst the policeman gave evidence. He told me it was so clear and blatantly obvious that he was lying even the coroner was nodding during this time. He also showed no remorse. I hope he gets a full criminal trial, and if convicted sent down for a long time.
All sympathies to Mr Tomlinson's family, but the police get damned if they do and damned if they don't. They have no prior knowledge of how bad a scene is going to develope, and I guess they get a bit scared and excited too. I do feel that push could not have caused internal bleeding, but obviously something did. BTW if the yobs didn't riot in the first place, these things would not happen!
-- answer removed --
A bit of PC Harwoods background...
http://www.telegraph....ession-inquiries.html
http://www.telegraph....ession-inquiries.html
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Yes jno, I have seen the footage and it is disturbing and shameful, but I still query that the push could cause internal injuries. Like I said, everyone was on edge, there was no reason to push the poor guy, but the police were or had been attacked by yobs so guess the pc had reached his limit, as people often do. Dreadful occurance.