Quizzes & Puzzles19 mins ago
Is There Such A Crime
as attempted manslaughter?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by bednobs. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Will take a seat on this one, I suppose everything you read on the internet isn't true ..
https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/w/i ndex.ph p?searc h=Attem pted+ma nslaugh ter& ;ns0=1
https:/
Like I said Chris .. I wasn't aware of any reference to UK law in the OPs question .. scan your eyes over a fairly recent case, albeit in the USA. What was the officer charged with ?
https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/Shoot ing_of_ Charles _Kinsey
https:/
//I would guess the closest is GBH with intent.//
No it isn't. There is no relationship between manslaughter and GBH with intent. The very essence of manslaughter is that the death is unintentional - i.e. there is no intent.
Manslaughter is when you kill somebody with no intention of doing so. A classic version of the offence is "single punch" manslaughter. A punch is thrown which in normal circumstances would simply result in a black eye. But the victim dies because, say, he has a thin skull or falls and hits his head. You cannot "attempt" to do that. If you set out to kill somebody and succeed it is murder; if they die at your hand but you did not intend for them to do so it is manslaughter.
No it isn't. There is no relationship between manslaughter and GBH with intent. The very essence of manslaughter is that the death is unintentional - i.e. there is no intent.
Manslaughter is when you kill somebody with no intention of doing so. A classic version of the offence is "single punch" manslaughter. A punch is thrown which in normal circumstances would simply result in a black eye. But the victim dies because, say, he has a thin skull or falls and hits his head. You cannot "attempt" to do that. If you set out to kill somebody and succeed it is murder; if they die at your hand but you did not intend for them to do so it is manslaughter.
No one has mentioned the Attempts Act which kinda changes things or not
rising to the challenge of not finding att. manslaughter in a british court - it comes up in BAILLI
z v Finland
https:/ /www.ba ilii.or g/cgi-b in/form at.cgi? doc=/eu /cases/ ECHR/19 97/10.h tml& ;query= (%22att empted+ manslau ghter%2 2)#disp 1
and a whole load of other cases
BUT 1. stinky europeans
and 2. in these heady days of Hard Brexit whether you think such cases are part of British Law or just advisory - or nothing
3. whether manslaughter in this translation exactly matches the european counterpart. Thpanith homocidio doloso cd be quite different from manslaughter.
[mein gott it sounds as tho I am an underemployed lawyer itching for a fee innit? oops doesnt it my lord, I mean ]
R v Creamer doesnt come up in BAILII
rising to the challenge of not finding att. manslaughter in a british court - it comes up in BAILLI
z v Finland
https:/
and a whole load of other cases
BUT 1. stinky europeans
and 2. in these heady days of Hard Brexit whether you think such cases are part of British Law or just advisory - or nothing
3. whether manslaughter in this translation exactly matches the european counterpart. Thpanith homocidio doloso cd be quite different from manslaughter.
[mein gott it sounds as tho I am an underemployed lawyer itching for a fee innit? oops doesnt it my lord, I mean ]
R v Creamer doesnt come up in BAILII
Yes but the definition of manslaughter varies from country to country.
In the UK it refers to the "reckless" rather than intentional taking of a life. Reckless means careless and with no regard for the possible consequences. In my "single punch" example (which I think is probably the easiest way to understand manslaughter) the assailant does not set out to kill his victim. The death occurs because of a set of circumstances that he should have foreseen but didn't. So he was reckless. You could say the death was accidental. You cannot attempt to kill somebody accidentally.
In the UK it refers to the "reckless" rather than intentional taking of a life. Reckless means careless and with no regard for the possible consequences. In my "single punch" example (which I think is probably the easiest way to understand manslaughter) the assailant does not set out to kill his victim. The death occurs because of a set of circumstances that he should have foreseen but didn't. So he was reckless. You could say the death was accidental. You cannot attempt to kill somebody accidentally.