Donate SIGN UP

Debt Collection Letter

Avatar Image
rockyracoon | 09:57 Fri 14th May 2010 | Law
5 Answers
I have received a letter from a DCA chasing an amount for a fella, I've never heard of him. I spoke to the DCA and they said they will remove my address from their records but also told me that this blokes name cannot be removed from my address unless he says so! The strange thing is, a couple of weeks ago a company tried to deliver some furniture to my address that I had not ordered, they had my door number and street but not the name or postcode, I sent them on there way but now I'm wondering if my address is being used for fraud. Any advise would be appreciated. The DCA told me to contact Experian?Equifax so find out where they came across my address. I've been on Experian website but it offers my credit rating and says if I ask for somebody elses I will be commiting a crime.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 5 of 5rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by rockyracoon. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
The most important thing is if bad debts are associated with an address it can affect you too. Put a note on your own credit file saying you are in no way associated with person X
Question Author
Thanks rowanwitch. This is what I am worried about, but the DCA said it won't affect it as they look at a person and not the address. Will have to look into putting a note on our file.
the law has chaned and the address wont be blacklisted now the person will. Probably because people live with their parents alot longer now and it isnt fair for the parents if they get in debt. I doubt your house is being used for fraud why would anyone have something delivered there when they know someone else must live there.
good advice there i just wanted to add that his name not being removed seesm common practice now, as at my last address i couldn't get TV installed as the previous tenant had never cancelled his subscription (don't know why not!!) so they couldn't install a second one in a different name. I guess that it's because it would be easy for you to ring on behalf of the person with the debt and pretend they've gone and you don't know where. Any way the point being, it doesn't necessarily suggest fraud.
Question Author
Thanks for all your responses, feel a bit easier about it now. Had a friend who had a nightmare with fraud at her address, took her months to get sorted so I was getting a bit paranoid.

1 to 5 of 5rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Debt Collection Letter

Answer Question >>