If You Could Live In Another Decade,...
ChatterBank0 min ago
Back to normal !!!
16 Answers
At last our tv progs can go back to normal. I don`t watch much tv, but I do like to be able to have a choice not just football.
Answers
1 to 16 of 16
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by beejaybee. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Rock'n'Roll, I'm with you 100%. For a start, no channel has shown ONLY football. Whenever there's been football on the last few weeks, there's been plenty of non-football stuff on the other channels - football-haters just like to make melodramatic claims about the amount of football being shown, purely for effect.
There's a major football tournament for a few weeks, once every 2 years. I accept lots of people don't like watching it. But I hate soaps, reality shows, talent shows, and programmes in which TV "experts" show all us clueless proles how to eat/dress/have relationships/raise our children/buy houses/decorate houses/sell houses etc etc, and I can't escape from them because THEY'RE ON EVERY SINGLE F***ING DAY OF EVERY YEAR. So, some of that sh*t having to move aside for a few football matches is no big deal.
There's a major football tournament for a few weeks, once every 2 years. I accept lots of people don't like watching it. But I hate soaps, reality shows, talent shows, and programmes in which TV "experts" show all us clueless proles how to eat/dress/have relationships/raise our children/buy houses/decorate houses/sell houses etc etc, and I can't escape from them because THEY'RE ON EVERY SINGLE F***ING DAY OF EVERY YEAR. So, some of that sh*t having to move aside for a few football matches is no big deal.
Oh, so it`s only every 2 years is it. I thought it was 4. lol. What about all the European cup matches that are on. Saturday matches, yes it`s only for about 8 months or so I know. Then there`s the motor racing which affects progs. We then had 2 weeks of tennis on 2 channels. That`s without the golf, & cricket. I personally don`t watch most of the type of progs you mention. Football was also shown on ITV 2.
beejay, even taking into account that you've suddenly thrown in other sports after first talking specifically about the football, all the things you've just mentioned are still a mere drop in the TV ocrean. The Champions League matches I think you were referring to, yes ITV1 show those live but over the course of a year they're pretty sporadic. The Saturday matches are only shown as highlights on Match of the Day, which is a part of the regular TV schedule during the season. An hour a week for 9 months... not exactly excessive is it?
By the way my "every 2 years" comment includes the European Championships, so those are the next big tournament, in 2008. Just so you're prepared to do some more football-avoiding in two years' time.
With the other sports you mention, Wimbledon is as you say 2 weeks a year; you're entitled to think that's too much but I think you'd be wrong - compare the hours of tennis broadcast to the total number of broadcast hours on BBC1 & 2 over a year and it's miniscule. You generally find that when there's golf on BBC2 and cricket on C4, it's exclusive to those channels and is therefore easy to avoid.
Does motor racing (which I find stupefyingly tedious) cause other programmes to move? Oh well... so do extended new bulletins, sometimes. Schedules are subject to change. It can be irritating if you're waiting for something, sure. But the times motor racing causes that to happen must be about as infrequent as when it's caused by extended news, surely?
I'm happy to read you join me in avoiding the utter crap that forms part of the schedules on a DAILY basis.
By the way my "every 2 years" comment includes the European Championships, so those are the next big tournament, in 2008. Just so you're prepared to do some more football-avoiding in two years' time.
With the other sports you mention, Wimbledon is as you say 2 weeks a year; you're entitled to think that's too much but I think you'd be wrong - compare the hours of tennis broadcast to the total number of broadcast hours on BBC1 & 2 over a year and it's miniscule. You generally find that when there's golf on BBC2 and cricket on C4, it's exclusive to those channels and is therefore easy to avoid.
Does motor racing (which I find stupefyingly tedious) cause other programmes to move? Oh well... so do extended new bulletins, sometimes. Schedules are subject to change. It can be irritating if you're waiting for something, sure. But the times motor racing causes that to happen must be about as infrequent as when it's caused by extended news, surely?
I'm happy to read you join me in avoiding the utter crap that forms part of the schedules on a DAILY basis.
-- answer removed --
Backdrifter. Yes, I did mention other sport, I admit. I honestly think that sport could be put on to one channel, but that will never happen. You mention that the news is sometimes extended. This only happens when something major happens, & I don`t think anyone objects in these instances. Ok. I admit defeat. I can see I`m "outvoted" by the football fans. Lol
-- answer removed --
Other way around, beejay - broadcasters pay the FA ludicrous sums of money for the rights to show the football.
For the BBC, something like MOTD is a well-established "brand" (yeccch, I hate that sort of marketing-speak!). It's heavily identified with the BBC and they want to maintain it. As for the live matches, the main terrestrial channels bid for them as it gives some prestige for them to be showing international England matches, they get pretty good viewing figures for them, and it helps to diversify their output. A sports-only terrestrial channel would probably never be approved, although soon the term "terrestrial" will be redundant as we move to digital-only.
There are already sports-only channels but I doubt that a "BBC Sport" channel would be able to meet a full schedule, no matter how much sport you think there is on TV. The fact remains that regardless of the impression you get when your programme annoyingly gets put back in the schedule, there actually isn't that much sport on "terrestrial" TV.
For the BBC, something like MOTD is a well-established "brand" (yeccch, I hate that sort of marketing-speak!). It's heavily identified with the BBC and they want to maintain it. As for the live matches, the main terrestrial channels bid for them as it gives some prestige for them to be showing international England matches, they get pretty good viewing figures for them, and it helps to diversify their output. A sports-only terrestrial channel would probably never be approved, although soon the term "terrestrial" will be redundant as we move to digital-only.
There are already sports-only channels but I doubt that a "BBC Sport" channel would be able to meet a full schedule, no matter how much sport you think there is on TV. The fact remains that regardless of the impression you get when your programme annoyingly gets put back in the schedule, there actually isn't that much sport on "terrestrial" TV.
1 to 16 of 16
Latest Posts
And Even More Good News From Labour.
News1 min ago
Crosswords21 mins ago
News32 mins ago
