Quizzes & Puzzles12 mins ago
Why Not Do The Same
16 Answers
On TV this morning they they said that Italy have the least infection rate, and has been held down for some time, mainly due to their rigorous successful very fast turn around testing procedure. So why is that here, and everywhere else were testing is failing that we and other countries don't adopt a system that has a proven record of success.
Is it a case that our government just don't want to admit they've got it wrong and just keep going down the wrong track. Italy are crying out for the British to holiday there so I would think they would be more than happy to share the system.
Is it a case that our government just don't want to admit they've got it wrong and just keep going down the wrong track. Italy are crying out for the British to holiday there so I would think they would be more than happy to share the system.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by teacake44. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Golly gosh, look what you find when you remember you're on the internet......
https:/ /www.it v.com/n ews/202 0-09-17 /speed- versus- accurac y-why-i taly-is -offeri ng-30-m inute-c ovid-19 -tests- and-the -uk-isn t
https:/
good link Zacs. For once I think TC has a point, I think the 30 minute turn around tests potential inaccuracy if more than compensated for with less isolation and waiting around. I think we should move to the quick test mechanism. I don;t think it's a case of "..our government just don't want to admit they've got it wrong", I think they are listening to "experts".
// I can't on the face of it see what the correlation is between better testing and the virus being transmitted.//
Neither can I BN and that is because there isnt one
the data is out there - NJ I think is the worst at someone who is innumerate dabbling in numbers. If you test a thousand and get 10 and then test a different two thousand and get 20 - tghe rate or ration has NOT gone up - but I agree you have ten more.
worse or better - if testing or testing more made a difference then in the down curve of four weeks ago - there should be a kink -method A is different to method B and so should affect numbers
it didnt - so from the data - it didnt make much difference
so there CAN'T have been twice as many earlier on as we thought as there would be a bloody great kink in the curve as the more accurate testing kicked in
the data is out there
Neither can I BN and that is because there isnt one
the data is out there - NJ I think is the worst at someone who is innumerate dabbling in numbers. If you test a thousand and get 10 and then test a different two thousand and get 20 - tghe rate or ration has NOT gone up - but I agree you have ten more.
worse or better - if testing or testing more made a difference then in the down curve of four weeks ago - there should be a kink -method A is different to method B and so should affect numbers
it didnt - so from the data - it didnt make much difference
so there CAN'T have been twice as many earlier on as we thought as there would be a bloody great kink in the curve as the more accurate testing kicked in
the data is out there
I think that the only way that faster test turn around could make a difference, assuming equal accuracy of fast and slow turnaround testing, is either if symptomatic people are allowed to wander the earth shedding virus until the test result comes back, or everybody and their dog is tested (its ok folks I am joking about the dog) and the asymptomatics are caught and isolated. but but but the second assumes that asymptomatics can share their bugs despite public precautions or that people are saying foo that to the public precautions as PP would say.
On top of the testing in Italy, and Spain for that matter, they have 2 or three police (walking) the streets to enforce the rules were needed. I visit several towns over a week, and since the full main lock down we had, I can honestly say I've not seen one police officer on foot, and if it comes to that, not very often in a patrol car. Are we really that short of police, if not were are they, or what are they doing?