I certainly didn't know it was Digs - but it's in the public arena now.
The MP who named him claimed to do so because he was worried aout the potential secret imprisonment of people who may have named Digs on Twitter.
How likely is that?
I feel it more likely that the Honourable Gentleman - the MP that is of course! - named Digs because he sees the Super-Injunction as supression of free speech.
It's a difficult balancing act for judges - between the right to privacy and protection of families, wighed against the freedom of speech and the 'right to know'.
I think with hindsight, Digs would have been better to let the media publish in the first pace, ride out the storm, and let it die quietly.
No chance of that happening now!