"his answer was , that t***will be doctoring the figures to make it look good"
Maybe so. But what I'm challenging here is this idea you have that when people say 'in real terms', it's some meaningless token of spin. This is patently wrong.
The Ed will be aware of what I mean when I say it isn't debatable. Seeing as you're not, I'll spell it out: If you are arguing with what the phrase 'real terms' means, then you are wrong. It's like debating whether 6 + 4 = 10. Seriously. Don't take my word for it - I'm a pretentious student who gets things wrong sometimes. Go and look it up in your local library. 'Real terms' is a perfectly valid and common term for a way of measuring value, not some spontaneous piece of spin. If you think it's flawed, then by all means say so - that's your right. But you can't do that until you understand what it is, which with all due respect you clearly don't.
factor: I'm beginning to feel that way as well, but it just saddens me to have to do that. At the back of my head, I'm just hoping that DF will see what I'm getting at, and that I'm not trying to say he doesn't have the right to be cynical - just that he should do so accurately. Maybe I'm just naive like that.