ChatterBank0 min ago
the poor lose out again
don't you love it when the tories say > in real terms <
does this mean they were only joking or lying terms last time
http://itn.co.uk/uk/2...out+in+NHS+reforms%27
god help the sick under the tory and liberals
does this mean they were only joking or lying terms last time
http://itn.co.uk/uk/2...out+in+NHS+reforms%27
god help the sick under the tory and liberals
Answers
Dr Filth.... your points on the NHS are well taken, but you have undermined your issue by politicising it. The inadequacies of the NHS have been highlighted and also increasing under ALL Political Parties.
08:12 Mon 01st Aug 2011
"his answer was , that t***will be doctoring the figures to make it look good"
Maybe so. But what I'm challenging here is this idea you have that when people say 'in real terms', it's some meaningless token of spin. This is patently wrong.
The Ed will be aware of what I mean when I say it isn't debatable. Seeing as you're not, I'll spell it out: If you are arguing with what the phrase 'real terms' means, then you are wrong. It's like debating whether 6 + 4 = 10. Seriously. Don't take my word for it - I'm a pretentious student who gets things wrong sometimes. Go and look it up in your local library. 'Real terms' is a perfectly valid and common term for a way of measuring value, not some spontaneous piece of spin. If you think it's flawed, then by all means say so - that's your right. But you can't do that until you understand what it is, which with all due respect you clearly don't.
factor: I'm beginning to feel that way as well, but it just saddens me to have to do that. At the back of my head, I'm just hoping that DF will see what I'm getting at, and that I'm not trying to say he doesn't have the right to be cynical - just that he should do so accurately. Maybe I'm just naive like that.
Maybe so. But what I'm challenging here is this idea you have that when people say 'in real terms', it's some meaningless token of spin. This is patently wrong.
The Ed will be aware of what I mean when I say it isn't debatable. Seeing as you're not, I'll spell it out: If you are arguing with what the phrase 'real terms' means, then you are wrong. It's like debating whether 6 + 4 = 10. Seriously. Don't take my word for it - I'm a pretentious student who gets things wrong sometimes. Go and look it up in your local library. 'Real terms' is a perfectly valid and common term for a way of measuring value, not some spontaneous piece of spin. If you think it's flawed, then by all means say so - that's your right. But you can't do that until you understand what it is, which with all due respect you clearly don't.
factor: I'm beginning to feel that way as well, but it just saddens me to have to do that. At the back of my head, I'm just hoping that DF will see what I'm getting at, and that I'm not trying to say he doesn't have the right to be cynical - just that he should do so accurately. Maybe I'm just naive like that.
rowanwitch there have been reports in all the papers this is one from the guardian
notice it is the guardian not the mail etc
http://www.guardian.c...reases-may-cost-lives
notice it is the guardian not the mail etc
http://www.guardian.c...reases-may-cost-lives
kromovaracum you could bring all the people from this place to me
http://www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/Pages/default.aspx
and i will give you and them the same answer they use the real term to fiddle the figures and make it look good
http://www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/Pages/default.aspx
and i will give you and them the same answer they use the real term to fiddle the figures and make it look good
DrFilth- announcing an increase in spending in real terms is not the same as claiming that all waiting lists will be eliminated, all problems will disappear, all meals will be placed in the right part of the bed.
You could double NHS spending (in real terms or absolute terms) but people will still have to wait for some operations or die in hospital
You could double NHS spending (in real terms or absolute terms) but people will still have to wait for some operations or die in hospital
factor here is some money they could have used for the nhs instead of blowing things up
http://www.guardian.c...aign-has-cost-uk-260m
http://www.guardian.c...aign-has-cost-uk-260m
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.