ChatterBank1 min ago
Should doctors be allowed to strike?
55 Answers
http://www.independen...pensions-7441053.html
I know they are private individuals and as such have a right to protest against the changes in their pensions, in anyway they deem necessary.
But on humanitarian grounds shouldn't a law be introduced to make it illegal for them to withdraw their services?
I know they are private individuals and as such have a right to protest against the changes in their pensions, in anyway they deem necessary.
But on humanitarian grounds shouldn't a law be introduced to make it illegal for them to withdraw their services?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.so if people earn more money than you (anyone), that makes it ok to deny them the right of striking or negotiating their terms and conditions of employment? as stated before, i would like to see how many people would be willing to endure the rigours of training that dr's face during their time at university and beyond. i teach medical students during their psych rotations - and see quite enough of their dedication and expected standards. i'd want more money/less hours/better pension as well! doesn't everyone?
I also followed his post naomi, like a pack of wolves going for the kill, I have also disagreed with AOG, but never ever have I been demeaning to him or anybody else, some abers on here should be ashamed of themselves - and no - I am not another Mother Teresa. When I saw the start of this post I thought "Here we go again". Getting back to the question No they should not be allowed to strike, they had a very good pay rise a little while back plus good working conditions, they are certainly not underpaid - and I do not think they will jeopardise what they have.
people employed by the nhs always grumble about pay/conditions. essentially, the government want to pay us as little as possible and get the most out of us as possible. things are going to get a little tetchy every time change/development of the nhs is mentioned. as both dr's and nurses (and most other sectors of the nhs for that matter) have started to ballot/strike for the first time since the 1970's...does that not make people think omg - the tories are fiddling with the nhs again? i think people should really start looking a little deeper than a little bit more pay or pension. some of the changes are fundamental, and there won't be much more of the 'humanitarian' nhs. and you will all be paying for it - firstly for the staff and secondly for a slowly but surely private, and entirely more expensive nhs than you ever considered.
So by your answer, Brenden, the right to strike should only be avalable to the less well paid, and preferably not after a "pay rise". The fact that their contracts were in effect discontinued, and renegotiated in the last few years as part of the new last NHS reforms, thereby denies them ever the right to strike again under your interpretation. Seems a bit prescriptive - if you pardon the unintended pun - and flies in the face of the "common-ness" of us all.
I quote from yesterday's BMA email...
"We have ruled out strike action"
Taking "action that will make an impact without harming harming patients is now a priority, along with continuing to urge the Government to return to talks."
Presumably action such as not attending management meetings is being considered.
I haven't met any doctor who intends to take any action that would harm patients - it would go completely against the grain so to do.
As regards the pension - the NHS pension fund is in good condition, and now receives 2 billion a year more than it pays out. This money goes back to HM Treasury, and is not reinvested to ensure the sustainability of future pensions.
In 2007 after tough negotiations with the last government, it was agreed that doctors should work longer, pay more towards their pensions, and receive less in the way of pensions. It was not expected that after a mere 4 years that the whole thing would be revisited, and even greater cuts would be demanded.
"We have ruled out strike action"
Taking "action that will make an impact without harming harming patients is now a priority, along with continuing to urge the Government to return to talks."
Presumably action such as not attending management meetings is being considered.
I haven't met any doctor who intends to take any action that would harm patients - it would go completely against the grain so to do.
As regards the pension - the NHS pension fund is in good condition, and now receives 2 billion a year more than it pays out. This money goes back to HM Treasury, and is not reinvested to ensure the sustainability of future pensions.
In 2007 after tough negotiations with the last government, it was agreed that doctors should work longer, pay more towards their pensions, and receive less in the way of pensions. It was not expected that after a mere 4 years that the whole thing would be revisited, and even greater cuts would be demanded.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.