Quizzes & Puzzles21 mins ago
"Quoting" other users
Morning,
I'm hoping to have a way for us to "quote" one another today.
Questions:
1. How would you like the quotes to look? Italics? Bold? A different colour? All suggestions will be considered.
2. How would you like to implement it? We need a trigger to tell the system "this is a quote". This trigger will be typed before and after the quote so the system to knows where to begin and end. Some options:
{quote}message to be "quoted"{quote}
[Q]message to be "quoted"[Q]
*message to be "quoted"*
It is possible we could put some pretty quote marks around the quote. Who would be in favour of this?
Maybe like this:
"Quoting"
I'm hoping to have a way for us to "quote" one another today.
Questions:
1. How would you like the quotes to look? Italics? Bold? A different colour? All suggestions will be considered.
2. How would you like to implement it? We need a trigger to tell the system "this is a quote". This trigger will be typed before and after the quote so the system to knows where to begin and end. Some options:
{quote}message to be "quoted"{quote}
[Q]message to be "quoted"[Q]
*message to be "quoted"*
It is possible we could put some pretty quote marks around the quote. Who would be in favour of this?
Maybe like this:
"Quoting"
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by AB Editor. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Do you mean an souped-up reply option which automatically picks up the quoted text ?
Where I've seen this it just seems to lead to everything being quoted and re-quoted all the time and makes the discussion threads very unwieldly. People also seem to be quite cunning at introducing slight 'mis-quotes' into what looks like an official reprise of a previous post ...
Or do you just mean a slightly easier select/cut/paste process ?
Where I've seen this it just seems to lead to everything being quoted and re-quoted all the time and makes the discussion threads very unwieldly. People also seem to be quite cunning at introducing slight 'mis-quotes' into what looks like an official reprise of a previous post ...
Or do you just mean a slightly easier select/cut/paste process ?
I put // around other people's quotes simply because I can't think of a better way of indicating that it is someone else's quote. Speech marks can too easily be 'lost'.
I can't remember how the bold and italics facilities worked before, but I know it was simple and effective. Just replacing that would suit me fine.
I can't remember how the bold and italics facilities worked before, but I know it was simple and effective. Just replacing that would suit me fine.
I quite like the way these people do it, seems neat and tidy to me.
http://i791.photobuck...7/D97x7/Capture-3.png
http://i791.photobuck...7/D97x7/Capture-3.png
I think care should be taken that the quote doesn't take prominence over the new post.
For example, if the quote was in bold and the new post not. As the quote is just introducing or illustrating the new post italics would be more appropriate.
D9's reference is neat, but however it is done, the new post must always be the most prominent element.
For example, if the quote was in bold and the new post not. As the quote is just introducing or illustrating the new post italics would be more appropriate.
D9's reference is neat, but however it is done, the new post must always be the most prominent element.
Example:
http://www.ffxiah.com...s-in-salvage/#1843915
The subject matter of linked post will make zero sense to anyone but gaming geeks. lol :)
http://www.ffxiah.com...s-in-salvage/#1843915
The subject matter of linked post will make zero sense to anyone but gaming geeks. lol :)