Sandy, this is not the rough and tumble of debate. Your post, if aimed at a religious group, would have been deemed unacceptable – there is no doubt of that - and their apologists would have been out in force on their behalf. Furthermore, suggesting on a thread that deals with a man who’s been beheaded by religious maniacs that another religious maniac would give atheists ‘short shrift’, really is, in my opinion, in the very poorest taste.
jno, nice try, but it doesn’t work. Had that ‘gentle wit’, as you call it, been aimed in another direction, you wouldn’t have considered it ‘gentle wit’ – you’d have been among the first to object - so your duplicity here does your reputation no favours whatsoever. Shameful as it was, you’ve said what you’ve said and it therefore comes as no surprise to discover that your only recourse is to attack the messenger.