Body & Soul10 mins ago
john terry, el hadji diouf, answerbankers and
43 Answers
Double standards.
Did El hadji diouf ever go to court for calling the ball boy
..........White boy ?...........
Did El hadji diouf ever go to court for calling the ball boy
..........White boy ?...........
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Mick-Talbot. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Mick-Talbot
I have to point you back to what I said earlier. The police investigated and perhaps found that the lad was lying. Perhaps they sent the case to the CPS and it was decided that there wasn't enough evidence.
It seems to me that it is NOT acceptable to say, "F off white boy", because if it were why were the police called, and why did they carry out an investigation?
I have to point you back to what I said earlier. The police investigated and perhaps found that the lad was lying. Perhaps they sent the case to the CPS and it was decided that there wasn't enough evidence.
It seems to me that it is NOT acceptable to say, "F off white boy", because if it were why were the police called, and why did they carry out an investigation?
ummmm
/// I think the majority of white people haven't suffered any oppression so comments regarding their colour are meaningless. ///
Now that is the most overgeneralised statement I have ever read.
But regardless of that, I thought black was beautiful and a colour to be proud of?
Now which is it something to be proud of or something to be ashamed of?
/// I think the majority of white people haven't suffered any oppression so comments regarding their colour are meaningless. ///
Now that is the most overgeneralised statement I have ever read.
But regardless of that, I thought black was beautiful and a colour to be proud of?
Now which is it something to be proud of or something to be ashamed of?
The law relating to this and to John Terry is that it's an offence to use threatening, abusive, or insulting words in the sight or hearing of someone likely to be caused harassment alarm or distress thereby. It becomes more serious as an offence if the words are also 'racially aggravated', that is displaying hostility directed at someone because of their presumed membership of some group of persons defined by race or religion.
First question therefore is whether saying 'F off' to the lad fell within the above definition, in particular 'likely to be caused'. It would be surprising if it did. Calling a boy a boy presumably isn't. So that leaves the racial element. It's highly unlikely that he would be alarmed or distressed by being callled white or that anyone hearing it would be. So does the statement as a whole become more alarming or distressing than the individual words? Possibly, but still not 'likely' to cause distress or alarm. That 'white boy', in the context, were words displaying intentional hostility towards the boy as of a 'group', a race, which is white is fairly plain, but the case fails because of the other elements which must be proved.
First question therefore is whether saying 'F off' to the lad fell within the above definition, in particular 'likely to be caused'. It would be surprising if it did. Calling a boy a boy presumably isn't. So that leaves the racial element. It's highly unlikely that he would be alarmed or distressed by being callled white or that anyone hearing it would be. So does the statement as a whole become more alarming or distressing than the individual words? Possibly, but still not 'likely' to cause distress or alarm. That 'white boy', in the context, were words displaying intentional hostility towards the boy as of a 'group', a race, which is white is fairly plain, but the case fails because of the other elements which must be proved.
// People have been saying that to me since when I was a boy, //
Ok. Can't argue with that I suppose.
Well if there's anyone out there that has a hankering to say 'F.. off black\white* boy' to anyone at random, your analysis gives them the green light. It's apparently neither racist nor likely to cause distress or offence. You learn something new on here every day.
(*delete as applicable)
Ok. Can't argue with that I suppose.
Well if there's anyone out there that has a hankering to say 'F.. off black\white* boy' to anyone at random, your analysis gives them the green light. It's apparently neither racist nor likely to cause distress or offence. You learn something new on here every day.
(*delete as applicable)
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.